Higher education governance and performance based funding as an ecology of games

被引:44
作者
Nisar, Muhammad Azfar [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
关键词
Higher education; Governance; Ecology of games; Performance based funding; INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE; ACCOUNTABILITY; INCENTIVES; UNIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-014-9775-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To address the problematic situation of higher education affordability, and literacy, President Obama has recently outlined a new strategy to make colleges more affordable for the middle class. While this strategy includes many components, "Paying for Performance" is a core components of this new strategy. In recent years, states have also focused on performance based policies to influence the behaviour of higher education institutions. However, most impact assessment studies have shown that such policies have had a limited effect on the performance of these institutions. Most explanations given for this failure have been on the basis of principal-agent theory, resource dependence theory and neo-institutionalism. All these analyses tend to view universities in isolation of their real world ecology. Drawing from the insights of ecology of games perspective, this paper explains the failure of performance based funding policies in terms of the inherent complexity of the higher education system. Policy design implications like flexibility, symbolic contextualization and decentralized financial governance for higher education governance are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 302
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The changing face of accountability - Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education [J].
Alexander, FK .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2000, 71 (04) :411-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CARN CLASS I HIGH ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Teachers College Record
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, EDUC RESEARCHER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TIMES HIGHER ED 1128
[6]  
[Anonymous], FACT SHEET PRES PLAN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1995, RES DOCTORATE PROGRA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CCRC Working Paper No. 37
[9]   The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system [J].
Barker, Katharine .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2007, 16 (01) :3-12
[10]  
Barnett R., 1992, IMPROVING HIGHER TOT