Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new

被引:124
作者
Joordens, S [1 ]
Hockley, WE
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Life Sci, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1534
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors use the qualitative differences logic to demonstrate that 2 separate memory influences underlie performance in recognition memory tasks, familiarity and recollection. The experiments focus on the mirror effect the finding that more memorable stimulus classes produce higher hit rates but lower false-alarm rates than less memorable stimulus classes. The authors demonstrate across a number of experiments that manipulations assumed to decrease recollection eliminate or even reverse the hit-rate portion of the mirror effect while leaving the false-alarm portion intact. This occurs whether the critical distinction between conditions is created during the test phase or manipulated during the study phase. Thus, when recollection is present, it dominates familiarity so that the hit-rate portion of the mirror effect primarily reflects recollection; when recollection is largely absent, the opposite pattern associated with the familiarity process emerges.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1555
页数:22
相关论文
共 84 条
[71]   REMEMBERING AND KNOWING - 2 MEANS OF ACCESS TO THE PERSONAL PAST [J].
RAJARAM, S .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1993, 21 (01) :89-102
[72]   COMPONENTS OF ACTIVATION - REPETITION AND PRIMING EFFECTS IN LEXICAL DECISION AND RECOGNITION [J].
RATCLIFF, R ;
HOCKLEY, W ;
MCKOON, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1985, 114 (04) :435-450
[73]   A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm [J].
Reder, LM ;
Nhouyvanisvong, A ;
Schunn, CD ;
Ayers, MS ;
Angstadt, P ;
Hiraki, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (02) :294-320
[74]  
Reingold E. M., 1990, Mind Lang., V5, P9, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1990.TB00150.X
[75]   Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves [J].
Rotello, CM ;
Macmillan, NA ;
Van Tassel, G .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 43 (01) :67-88
[76]   NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF RECOLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE DURING RECOGNITION MEMORY JUDGMENTS [J].
SMITH, ME .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (01) :1-13
[77]   STRATEGIC CONTROL OF PROCESSING IN WORD RECOGNITION [J].
STONE, GO ;
VANORDEN, GC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1993, 19 (04) :744-774
[78]   On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory [J].
Stretch, V ;
Wixted, JT .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1998, 24 (06) :1379-1396
[79]   MEMORY AND CONSCIOUSNESS [J].
TULVING, E .
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 1985, 26 (01) :1-12
[80]   The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis [J].
Whittlesea, BWA ;
Williams, LD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (03) :547-565