Embolization for the treatment of idiopathic posterior epistaxis

被引:26
作者
Gurney, TA
Dowd, CF
Murr, AH
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY | 2004年 / 18卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1177/194589240401800513
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: The goal of this study was to examine safety and efficacy of transarterial embolization for the treatment of idiopathic posterior epistaxis. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to characterize the underlying conditions of eighty-one consecutive patients for whom complete records were available presenting with posterior epistaxis, the associated risk factors for patients with idiopathic posterior epistaxis, and the success rate of embolization in this patient population. Results: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing embolization for epistaxis were identified and 81 patients were included in the analysis. Nineteen patients did not have sufficient and retrievable medical records to be included in the study. Idiopathic posterior epistaxis was the most common underlying etiology of patients with refractory posterior epistaxis (34%). Hypertension, vascular disease, and diabetes were frequently detected comorbid diseases. Patients were equally as likely to be hypertensive as normotensive at the time of presentation (45 and 55%, respectively). Most patients (83%) had failed at least one prior treatment modality. Few patients had a recurrence of epistaxis within 72 hours (three patients [12%]) or had an adverse effect associated with embolization (three patients [12%]). Conclusion: Embolization for the treatment of posterior epistaxis is a safe and effective treatment modality.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 339
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Effectiveness of surgical management of epistaxis at a tertiary care center [J].
Barlow, DW ;
Deleyiannis, WB ;
Pinczower, EF .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (01) :21-24
[2]   Complications resulting from treatment of severe posterior epistaxis [J].
Bent, JP ;
Wood, BP .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1999, 113 (03) :252-254
[3]   Delayed epistaxis resulting from external carotid artery injury requiring embolization: A rare complication of transsphenoidal surgery: Case report [J].
Cockroft, KM ;
Carew, JF ;
Trost, D ;
Fraser, RAR .
NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 47 (01) :236-239
[4]   Comparison of internal maxillary artery ligation versus embolization for refractory posterior epistaxis [J].
Cullen, MM ;
Tami, TA .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1998, 118 (05) :636-642
[5]  
della Faille D., 1997, Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica, V51, P167
[6]   ANGIOGRAPHIC EMBOLIZATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF EPISTAXIS - A REVIEW OF 108 CASES [J].
ELDEN, L ;
MONTANERA, W ;
TERBRUGGE, K ;
WILLINSKY, R ;
LASJAUNIAS, P ;
CHARLES, D .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1994, 111 (01) :44-50
[7]  
EMMANUEL JM, 1998, OTOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD, P859
[8]   Surgical management of posterior epistaxis: A changing paradigm [J].
Klotz, DA ;
Winkle, MR ;
Richmon, J ;
Hengerer, AS .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (09) :1577-1582
[9]   Microcatheter embolization of intractable idiopathic epistaxis [J].
Leppänen, M ;
Seppänen, S ;
Laranne, J ;
Kuoppala, K .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 22 (06) :499-503
[10]  
MAMES RN, 1991, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V98, P527