Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity

被引:422
作者
Liu, JG [1 ]
Daily, GC
Ehrlich, PR
Luck, GW
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Ctr Conservat Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature01359
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Human population size and growth rate are often considered important drivers of biodiversity loss(1-6), whereas household dynamics are usually neglected. Aggregate demographic statistics may mask substantial changes in the size and number of households, and their effects on biodiversity. Household dynamics influence per capita consumption(7,8) and thus biodiversity through, for example, consumption of wood for fuel(9), habitat alteration for home building and associated activities(10-12), and greenhouse gas emissions(13). Here we report that growth in household numbers globally, and particularly in countries with biodiversity hotspots (areas rich in endemic species and threatened by human activities 14), was more rapid than aggregate population growth between 1985 and 2000. Even when population size declined, the number of households increased substantially. Had the average household size (that is, the number of occupants) remained static, there would have been 155 million fewer households in hotspot countries in 2000. Reduction in average household size alone will add a projected 233 million additional households to hotspot countries during the period 2000-15. Rapid increase in household numbers, often manifested as urban sprawl, and resultant higher per capita resource consumption in smaller households(15-19) pose serious challenges to biodiversity conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 533
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   RURAL HOUSEHOLD ENERGY USE IN CHINA [J].
KAUL, S ;
QIAN, L .
ENERGY, 1992, 17 (04) :405-411
[12]  
Kinsella K. G., 2001, AGING WORLD 2001
[13]   COMPONENTS OF A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2 RATES [J].
KITAGAWA, EM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1955, 50 (272) :1168-1194
[14]   Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds [J].
Kluza, DA ;
Griffin, CR ;
DeGraaf, RM .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 3 :15-26
[15]   A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia [J].
Lenzen, M ;
Murray, SA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 37 (02) :229-255
[16]   Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas [J].
Liu, JG ;
Linderman, M ;
Ouyang, ZY ;
An, L ;
Yang, J ;
Zhang, HM .
SCIENCE, 2001, 292 (5514) :98-101
[17]   Population, households, and CO2 emissions [J].
MacKellar, FL ;
Lutz, W ;
Prinz, C ;
Goujon, A .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1995, 21 (04) :849-&
[18]  
McNeely JA., 1996, HUMAN POPULATION BIO, P19
[19]   CHANGES IN THE PROPENSITY TO LIVE ALONE - 1950-1976 [J].
MICHAEL, RT ;
FUCHS, VR ;
SCOTT, SR .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1980, 17 (01) :39-56
[20]   Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities [J].
Myers, N ;
Mittermeier, RA ;
Mittermeier, CG ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Kent, J .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6772) :853-858