Image-Quality Assessment for Several Positron Emitters Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards in the Siemens Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner

被引:125
作者
Disselhorst, Jonathan A. [1 ,2 ]
Brom, Maarten [1 ]
Laverman, Peter [1 ]
Slump, Cornelius H. [1 ]
Boerman, Otto C. [1 ]
Oyen, Wim J. G. [1 ]
Gotthardt, Martin [1 ]
Visser, Eric P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Inst Tech Med, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
positron emission tomography; small-animal; positron range; image quality; NEMA; YTTRIUM-86; RESOLUTION; BR-76; QUANTITATION; REMOVAL; I-124; 2D;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.109.068858
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The positron emitters F-18, Ga-68, I-124, and Zr-89 are all relevant in small-animal PET. Each of these radionuclides has different positron energies and ranges and a different fraction of single photons emitted. Average positron ranges larger than the intrinsic spatial resolution of the scanner (for I-124 and Ga-68) will deteriorate the effective spatial resolution and activity recovery coefficient (RC) for small lesions or phantom structures. The presence of single photons (for I-124 and Zr-89) could increase image noise and spillover ratios (SORs). Methods: Image noise, expressed as percentage SD in a uniform region (% SD), RC, and SOR (in air and water) were determined using the NEMA NU 4 small-animal image-quality phantom filled with 3.7 MBq of total activity of F-18, Ga-68, I-124, or Zr-89. Filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered-subset expectation maximization in 2 dimensions, and maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstructions were compared. In addition to the NEMA NU 4 image-quality parameters, spatial resolutions were determined using small glass capillaries filled with these radionuclides in a water environment. Results: The % SD for F-18, Ga-68, I-124, and Zr-89 using FBP was 6.27, 6.40, 6.74, and 5.83, respectively. The respective RCs were 0.21, 0.11, 0.12, and 0.19 for the 1-mm-diameter rod and 0.97, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.88 for the 5-mm-diameter rod. SORs in air were 0.01, 0.03, 0.04, and 0.01, respectively, and in water 0.02, 0.10, 0.13, and 0.02. Other reconstruction algorithms gave similar differences between the radionuclides. MAP produced the highest RCs. For the glass capillaries using FBP, the full widths at half maximum for F-18, Ga-68, I-124, and Zr-89 were 1.81, 2.46, 2.38, and 1.99 mm, respectively. The corresponding full widths at tenth maximum were 3.57, 6.52, 5.87, and 4.01 mm. Conclusion: With the intrinsic spatial resolution (approximate to 1.5 mm) of this latest-generation small-animal PET scanner, the finite positron range has become the limiting factor for the overall spatial resolution and activity recovery in small structures imaged with I-124 and 68Ga. The presence of single photons had only a limited effect on the image noise. MAP, as compared with the other reconstruction algorithms, increased RC and decreased %SD and SOR.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 617
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, 37 ICRU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NEMA STAND PUBL
[3]  
Bai B, 2003, IEEE, V4, P2501
[4]   Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards [J].
Bao, Qinan ;
Newport, Danny ;
Chen, Mu ;
Stout, David B. ;
Chatziioannou, Arion F. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 (03) :401-408
[5]   Quantitative imaging of bromine-76 and yttrium-86 with PET: A method for removal of spurious activity introduced by cascade gamma rays [J].
Beattie, BJ ;
Finn, RD ;
Rowland, DJ ;
Pentlow, KS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) :2410-2423
[6]   Advances in the production, processing and microPET image quality of technetium-94m [J].
Bigott, Heather M. ;
Laforest, Richard ;
Liu, Xiaodong ;
Ruangma, Ananya ;
Wuest, Frank ;
Welch, Michael J. .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 33 (07) :923-933
[7]   PET imaging with yttrium-86:: comparison of phantom measurements acquired with different PET scanners before and after applying background subtraction [J].
Buchholz, HG ;
Herzog, H ;
Förster, GJ ;
Reber, H ;
Nickel, O ;
Rösch, F ;
Bartenstein, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (05) :716-720
[8]   Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner [J].
Constantinescu, Cristian C. ;
Mukherjee, Jogeshwar .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (09) :2885-2899
[9]   Optimization and assessment of quantitative 124I imaging on a Philips Gemini dual GS PET/CT system [J].
Gregory, Rebecca A. ;
Hooker, Claire A. ;
Partridge, Mike ;
Flux, Glenn D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 (07) :1037-1048
[10]   Non-[18F]FDG PET in clinical oncology [J].
Groves, Ashley M. ;
Win, Thida ;
Ben Haim, Simona ;
Ell, Peter J. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (09) :822-830