US trade remedy law and agriculture: trade diversion and investigation effects

被引:19
作者
Carter, Colin A. [1 ]
Gunning-Trant, Caroline [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE | 2010年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
UNITED-STATES; ANTIDUMPING MEASURES; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01565.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study U.S. agricultural antidumping and countervailing duty cases from 1980 to 2005, and gauge the effectiveness of trade remedy law as a form of protection. The purpose is to measure the resulting investigation and trade diversion effects. Previous research on trade in manufactured products has shown that the domestic protection offered by AD and CV duties is largely offset by trade diversion. In contrast, we find that for agriculture, trade diversion is relatively unimportant. So AD and CVD cases are very effective forms of protection for U.S. agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 126
页数:30
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] *US INT TRAD COMM, 2005, PUBL US INT TRAD COM, V3750, P20
  • [32] *US INT TRAD COMM, 2004, INT TAR TRAD DAT WEB
  • [33] Trade remedy actions in NAFTA: Agriculture and agri-food industries
    Wainio, J
    Young, LM
    Meilke, K
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2003, 26 (07) : 1041 - 1065
  • [34] Anti-dumping: What are the numbers to discuss at Doha?
    Zanardi, M
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2004, 27 (03) : 403 - 433
  • [35] Zanardi M., 2006, EUR J POLIT ECON, V22, P591, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2005.12.003
  • [36] 1980, US FED REG