Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing

被引:59
作者
Zickfeld, Kirsten [1 ]
Morgan, M. Granger [2 ]
Frame, David J. [3 ,4 ]
Keith, David W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Sch Earth & Ocean Sci, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Smith Sch Enterprise & Environm, Oxford OX1 2BQ, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Phys, Oxford OX1 2BQ, England
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
climate change; climate sensitivity; transient climate response; expert elicitation; uncertainty analysis; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0908906107
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There is uncertainty about the response of the climate system to future trajectories of radiative forcing. To quantify this uncertainty we conducted face-to-face interviews with 14 leading climate scientists, using formal methods of expert elicitation. We structured the interviews around three scenarios of radiative forcing stabilizing at different levels. All experts ranked "cloud radiative feedbacks" as contributing most to their uncertainty about future global mean temperature change, irrespective of the specified level of radiative forcing. The experts disagreed about the relative contribution of other physical processes to their uncertainty about future temperature change. For a forcing trajectory that stabilized at 7 Wm(-2) in 2200, 13 of the 14 experts judged the probability that the climate system would undergo, or be irrevocably committed to, a "basic state change" as >= 0.5. The width and median values of the probability distributions elicited from the different experts for future global mean temperature change under the specified forcing trajectories vary considerably. Even for a moderate increase in forcing by the year 2050, the medians of the elicited distributions of temperature change relative to 2000 range from 0.8-1.8 degrees C, and some of the interquartile ranges do not overlap. Ten of the 14 experts estimated that the probability that equilibrium climate sensitivity exceeds 4.5 degrees C is >0.17, our interpretation of the upper limit of the "likely" range given by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Finally, most experts anticipated that over the next 20 years research will be able to achieve only modest reductions in their degree of uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:12451 / 12456
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] Morgan MG, 1990, UNCERTAINTY GUIDE DE
  • [12] The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
    Moss, Richard H.
    Edmonds, Jae A.
    Hibbard, Kathy A.
    Manning, Martin R.
    Rose, Steven K.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Carter, Timothy R.
    Emori, Seita
    Kainuma, Mikiko
    Kram, Tom
    Meehl, Gerald A.
    Mitchell, John F. B.
    Nakicenovic, Nebojsa
    Riahi, Keywan
    Smith, Steven J.
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Thomson, Allison M.
    Weyant, John P.
    Wilbanks, Thomas J.
    [J]. NATURE, 2010, 463 (7282) : 747 - 756
  • [13] Schneider SH, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P779
  • [14] Solomon S, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1
  • [15] PROBABILITY ENCODING IN DECISION ANALYSIS
    SPETZLER, CS
    STAELVONHOLSTEIN, CAS
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1975, 22 (03) : 340 - 358
  • [16] JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - HEURISTICS AND BIASES
    TVERSKY, A
    KAHNEMAN, D
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4157) : 1124 - 1131
  • [17] von Winterfeldt D, 1986, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research
  • [18] Watson SR., 1987, DECISION SYNTHESIS P
  • [19] Expert judgements on the response of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation to climate change
    Zickfeld, Kirsten
    Levermann, Anders
    Morgan, M. Granger
    Kuhlbrodt, Till
    Rahmstorf, Stefan
    Keith, David W.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2007, 82 (3-4) : 235 - 265