Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches

被引:200
作者
Di Baldassarre, Giuliano [1 ]
Schumann, Guy [2 ]
Bates, Paul D. [2 ]
Freer, Jim E. [2 ]
Beven, Keith J. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster, England
[4] Uppsala Univ, GeoCtr, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] EPFL, ISTAM, ECHO, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2010年 / 55卷 / 03期
关键词
flood-plain mapping; hydraulic models; flood hazard; uncertainty analysis; FINITE-ELEMENT; RADAR IMAGERY; INUNDATION; UNCERTAINTY; MODEL; EQUIFINALITY; FLOWS; RISK; INFORMATION; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1080/02626661003683389
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Different methodologies for flood-plain mapping are analysed and discussed by comparing deterministic and probabilistic approaches using hydrodynamic numerical solutions. In order to facilitate the critical discussion, state-of-art techniques in the field of flood inundation modelling are applied to a specific test site (River Dee, UK). Specifically, different flood-plain maps are derived for this test site. A first map is built by applying an advanced deterministic approach: use of a fully two-dimensional finite element model (TELEMAC-2D), calibrated against a historical flood extent, to derive a 1-in-100 year flood inundation map. A second map is derived by using a probabilistic approach: use of a simple raster-based inundation model (LISFLOOD-FP) to derive an uncertain flood extent map predicting the 1-in-100 year event conditioned on the extent of the 2006 flood. The flood-plain maps are then compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the two different approaches are critically discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 376
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, RISK BAS AN FLOOD DA
  • [2] A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks
    Apel, H
    Thieken, AH
    Merz, B
    Blöschl, G
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2006, 38 (1-2) : 79 - 100
  • [3] Flood risk analyses-how detailed do we need to be?
    Apel, H.
    Aronica, G. T.
    Kreibich, H.
    Thieken, A. H.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 49 (01) : 79 - 98
  • [4] Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data
    Aronica, G
    Hankin, B
    Beven, K
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1998, 22 (04) : 349 - 365
  • [5] Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE
    Aronica, G
    Bates, PD
    Horritt, MS
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (10) : 2001 - 2016
  • [6] MODELING FLOODPLAIN FLOWS USING A 2-DIMENSIONAL FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL
    BATES, PD
    ANDERSON, MG
    BAIRD, L
    WALLING, DE
    SIMM, D
    [J]. EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 1992, 17 (06) : 575 - 588
  • [7] Bayesian updating of flood inundation likelihoods conditioned on flood extent data
    Bates, PD
    Horritt, MS
    Aronica, G
    Beven, K
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (17) : 3347 - 3370
  • [8] Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling
    Bates, PD
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (13) : 2593 - 2597
  • [9] A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation
    Bates, PD
    De Roo, APJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 236 (1-2) : 54 - 77
  • [10] A manifesto for the equifinality thesis
    Beven, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 320 (1-2) : 18 - 36