Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches

被引:200
作者
Di Baldassarre, Giuliano [1 ]
Schumann, Guy [2 ]
Bates, Paul D. [2 ]
Freer, Jim E. [2 ]
Beven, Keith J. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster, England
[4] Uppsala Univ, GeoCtr, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] EPFL, ISTAM, ECHO, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2010年 / 55卷 / 03期
关键词
flood-plain mapping; hydraulic models; flood hazard; uncertainty analysis; FINITE-ELEMENT; RADAR IMAGERY; INUNDATION; UNCERTAINTY; MODEL; EQUIFINALITY; FLOWS; RISK; INFORMATION; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1080/02626661003683389
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Different methodologies for flood-plain mapping are analysed and discussed by comparing deterministic and probabilistic approaches using hydrodynamic numerical solutions. In order to facilitate the critical discussion, state-of-art techniques in the field of flood inundation modelling are applied to a specific test site (River Dee, UK). Specifically, different flood-plain maps are derived for this test site. A first map is built by applying an advanced deterministic approach: use of a fully two-dimensional finite element model (TELEMAC-2D), calibrated against a historical flood extent, to derive a 1-in-100 year flood inundation map. A second map is derived by using a probabilistic approach: use of a simple raster-based inundation model (LISFLOOD-FP) to derive an uncertain flood extent map predicting the 1-in-100 year event conditioned on the extent of the 2006 flood. The flood-plain maps are then compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the two different approaches are critically discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 376
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]   NATURAL DISASTERS [J].
NOJI, EK .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1991, 7 (02) :271-292
[42]   Flooding and human health - The dangers posed are not always obvious [J].
Ohl, CA ;
Tapsell, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7270) :1167-1168
[43]   A REVIEW ON IMAGE SEGMENTATION TECHNIQUES [J].
PAL, NR ;
PAL, SK .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1993, 26 (09) :1277-1294
[44]   Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis [J].
Pappenberger, F. ;
Beven, K. J. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (05)
[45]   Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations [J].
Pappenberger, F ;
Beven, K ;
Horritt, M ;
Blazkova, S .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 302 (1-4) :46-69
[46]   Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions [J].
Pappenberger, Florian ;
Matgen, Patrick ;
Beven, Keith J. ;
Henry, Jean-Baptiste ;
Pfister, Laurent ;
de, Paul Fraipont .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (10) :1430-1449
[47]   Accounting for heteroscedasticity in rating curve estimates [J].
Petersen-Overleir, A .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 292 (1-4) :173-181
[48]  
Reed D.W., 1999, Flood Estimation Handbook (Procedures for Flood Frequency Estimation)
[49]   Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps [J].
Romanowicz, R ;
Beven, K .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (03) :SWC41-SWC412
[50]   Dynamic real-time prediction of flood inundation probabilities [J].
Romanowicz, R ;
Beven, K .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1998, 43 (02) :181-196