Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effect of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy

被引:562
作者
Koufteros, X
Vonderembse, M
Jayaram, J
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33301 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5915.2005.00067.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Effective product development requires firms to unify internal and external participants. As companies attempt to create this integrated environment, two important questions emerge. Does a high level of internal integration lead to a higher level of external integration? In the context of product development, this study considers whether internal integration in the form of concurrent engineering practices affects the level of external integration as manifested by customer integration, supplier product integration, and supplier process integration. External integration, in turn, may influence competitive capabilities, namely product innovation performance and quality performance. Second, using contingency theory, do certain contextual variables moderate the linkages between integration strategy (external and internal) and performance? Specifically, this study considers whether uncertainty, equivocality, and platform development strategy change the relationships among internal integration, external integration, and competitive capabilities. Data collected from 244 manufacturing firms across several industries were used to test these research questions. The results indicate that both internal and external integration positively influence product innovation and quality and ultimately, profitability. With respect to contingency effects, the results indicate that equivocality moderates the relationships between integration and performance.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 133
页数:37
相关论文
共 87 条
[31]   ACCELERATING ADAPTIVE PROCESSES - PRODUCT INNOVATION IN THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INDUSTRY [J].
EISENHARDT, KM ;
TABRIZI, BN .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1995, 40 (01) :84-110
[32]   The R and D Marketing interface and single informant bias in NPD research: an illustration of a benchmarking case study [J].
Ernst, H ;
Teichert, T .
TECHNOVATION, 1998, 18 (12) :721-739
[33]  
Evans J.R., 1996, BENCHMARKING QUALITY, V3, P43
[34]   EVALUATING STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR [J].
FORNELL, C ;
LARCKER, DF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1981, 18 (01) :39-50
[35]  
Galbraith J.R., 1973, Designing complex organizations
[36]  
GARVIN DA, 1984, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V26, P25
[37]   An evaluation of research on Integrated Product Development [J].
Gerwin, D ;
Barrowman, NJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (07) :938-953
[38]  
Griffin A, 1997, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V14, P429
[39]   ACCELERATING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY-BASED NEW PRODUCTS [J].
GUPTA, AK ;
WILEMON, DL .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1990, 32 (02) :24-53
[40]   A MODEL FOR STUDYING RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT - MARKETING INTERFACE IN THE PRODUCT INNOVATION PROCESS [J].
GUPTA, AK ;
RAJ, SP ;
WILEMON, D .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1986, 50 (02) :7-17