Measurement of cardiac output before and after cardiopulmonary bypass:: Comparison among aortic transit-time ultrasound, thermodilution, and noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing

被引:73
作者
Botero, M
Kirby, D
Lobato, EB
Staples, ED
Gravenstein, N
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Cardiovasc & Thorac Surg, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
carbon dioxide; partial rebreathing; thermodilution; cardiac output;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2004.07.005
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: A noninvasive continuous cardiac output system (NICO) has been developed recently. NICO uses a ratio of the change in the end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure and carbon dioxide elimination in response to a brief period of partial rebreathing to measure CO. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement among NICO, bolus (TDCO), and continuous thermodilution (CCO), with transit-time flowmetry of the ascending aorta using an ultrasonic flow probe (UFP) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Design: Prospective, observational human study. Setting: Veterans Affairs Medical Center Hospital. Participants: Sixty-eight patients. Methods: Matched sets of CO measurements between NICO, TDCO, CCO, and UFP were collected in 68 patients undergoing elective CABG at specific time periods before and after separation from CPB. After anesthetic induction, all patients had an NICO sensor attached between the endotracheal tube and the breathing circuit, a PAC floated into the pulmonary artery for TDCO and CCO monitoring, and a UFP positioned on the ascending aorta and used for the reference CO. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement among the different methods. Measurements and Main Results: Bland-Altman analysis of CO measurements before CPB yielded a bias, precision, and percent error of 0.04 L/min +/- 1.07 L/min (44.8%) for NICO, 0.18 L/min +/- 1.01 L/min (41.7%) for TDCO, and 0.29 L/min +/- 1.40 L/min (57.5%) for CCO compared with simultaneous UFP CO measurements, respectively. After separation from CPB (average 29 mins), bias, precision, and percent error were -0.46 L/min +/- 1.06 L/min (37.3%) for NICO, 0.35 L/min +/- 1.39 L/min (46.1%) for TDCO, and 0.36 L/min +/- 1.96 L/min (64.7%) for CCO compared with UFP CO measurements, respectively. Conclusions: Before initiation of CPB, the accuracy for all 3 techniques was similar. After separation from CPB, the tendency was for NICO to underestimate CO and for TDCO and CCO to overestimate it. NICO offers an alternative to invasive CO measurement. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 572
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, Fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients [J].
Axler, O ;
Tousignant, C ;
Thompson, CR ;
DallavaSantucci, J ;
Phang, PT ;
Russell, JA ;
Walley, KR .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 11 (03) :109-116
[2]   Partial CO2 rebreathing Fick technique for noninvasive measurement of cardiac output [J].
Bailey, PL ;
Haryadi, DG ;
Orr, JA ;
Westenskow, DR .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (04) :SCA53-SCA53
[3]   Blood volume measurement - The next intraoperative monitor? [J].
Barker, SJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (06) :1310-1312
[4]   Transit time flow measurement: Experimental validation and comparison of three different systems [J].
Beldi, G ;
Bosshard, A ;
Hess, OM ;
Althaus, U ;
Walpoth, BH .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (01) :212-217
[5]  
BERMUDEZ J, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P690
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]  
Blas ML, 2000, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V93, pU142
[8]   NONINVASIVE PULMONARY BLOOD-FLOW MEASUREMENT BY MEANS OF CO2 ANALYSIS OF EXPIRATORY GASES [J].
BOSMAN, RJ ;
STOUTENBEEK, CP ;
ZANDSTRA, DF .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1991, 17 (02) :98-102
[9]   CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT CARDIAC-OUTPUT MEASUREMENT IN CARDIAC SURGICAL PATIENTS UNDERGOING HYPOTHERMIC CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS [J].
BOTTIGER, BW ;
RAUCH, H ;
BOHRER, H ;
MOTSCH, J ;
SODER, M ;
FLEISCHER, F ;
MARTIN, E .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 1995, 9 (04) :405-411
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF CARDIAC OUTPUT BY THERMAL DILUTION IN MAN [J].
BRANTHWAITE, MA ;
BRADLEY, RD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1968, 24 (03) :434-+