Changing patterns of perinatal death, 1982-2000: a retrospective cohort study

被引:59
作者
Bell, R [1 ]
Glinianaia, SV
Rankin, J
Wright, C
Pearce, MS
Parker, L
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Sch Populat & Hlth Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Royal Victoria Infirm, Dept Pathol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Royal Victoria Infirm, Sir James Spence Inst, Fac Med Sci,Sch Clin Med Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION | 2004年 / 89卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/adc.2003.038414
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe trends in cause specific stillbirth and neonatal mortality. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting and participants: 686 860 births in 1982 - 2000, to mothers resident in the Northern Region of England. Main outcome measures: Cause specific stillbirth and neonatal mortality; rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in 1991 - 2000 compared with 1982 - 1990. Results: In singletons, rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality declined over time ( RR stillbirths, 0.81 ( 95% CI 0.76 to 0.87); RR neonatal mortality, 0.76 ( 95% CI 0.70 to 0.82)). Death from congenital anomalies declined substantially for both stillbirths ( RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.68) and neonatal mortality ( RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.67). Mortality due to intrapartum hypoxia also fell, by nearly 50% for stillbirths and 30% for neonatal deaths. There was no reduction in stillbirths due to antepartum hypoxia in babies weighing greater than or equal to 2500 g, or in mortality attributed to infection. In multiples, the risk of death was higher ( RR stillbirths, 4.13 (95% CI 3.68 to 4.64); RR neonatal death, 7.82 (95% CI 7.13 to 8.58)). Stillbirth rates declined significantly (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89) but neonatal mortality did not ( RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08). There was no reduction in neonatal mortality resulting from prematurity, or in mortality from congenital anomalies. Conclusions: There is considerable overlap in the causes of stillbirth and neonatal mortality. Future progress in reducing perinatal mortality requires better understanding of the aetiology of antepartum stillbirth, of the excess risks of prematurity facing multiple births, particularly in the light of their increasing incidence, and of strategies to prevent perinatal infection.
引用
收藏
页码:F531 / F536
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Changes in stillbirth and infant mortality associated with increases in preterm birth among twins [J].
Joseph, KS ;
Marcoux, S ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Liu, SL ;
Allen, AC ;
Kramer, MS ;
Wen, SW .
PEDIATRICS, 2001, 108 (05) :1055-1061
[22]   Analysis of perinatal mortality and its components: Time for a change? [J].
Kramer, MS ;
Liu, SL ;
Luo, ZC ;
Yuan, HB ;
Platt, RW ;
Joseph, KS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 156 (06) :493-497
[23]  
Macfarlane A, 2000, BIRTH COUNTS STAT PR, V1
[24]  
Mastroiacovo P, 1999, AM J MED GENET, V83, P117, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990312)83:2<117::AID-AJMG7>3.0.CO
[25]  
2-4
[26]   Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome [J].
Morris, JK ;
Mutton, DE ;
Alberman, E .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (01) :2-6
[27]   Stillbirth and neonatal mortality due to congenital anomalies: temporal trends and variation by small area deprivation scores in England and Wales, 1986-96 [J].
Neasham, D ;
Dolk, H ;
Vrijheid, M ;
Jensen, T ;
Best, N .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) :364-373
[28]  
*NO RMSO, 2002, ANN REP 2000
[29]   The changing prevalence of neural tube defects: a population-based study in the North of England, 1984-96 [J].
Rankin, J ;
Glinianaia, S ;
Brown, R ;
Renwick, M .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) :104-110
[30]   The influence of prenatal screening and termination of pregnancy on perinatal mortality rates [J].
van der Pal-de Bruin, KM ;
Graafmans, W ;
Biermans, MCJ ;
Richardus, JH ;
Zijlstra, AG ;
Reefhuis, J ;
Mackenbach, JP ;
Verloove-Vanhorick, SP .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2002, 22 (11) :966-972