Adoption of new and really new products: The effects of self-regulation systems and risk salience

被引:176
作者
Herzenstein, Michal [1 ]
Posavac, Steven S.
Brakus, J. Josko
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Alfred Lerner Coll Business & Econ, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Simon Grad Sch Business, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.44.2.251
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article explores how consumers' self-regulation affects the likelihood of purchases of new and really new products. A mall-intercept field study shows that consumers with a chronic disposition to be promotion focused own more new high-technology goods and newly launched repeat-purchase items than prevention-focused consumers. There is no difference in ownership of products that have been available for many years. Two laboratory experiments further investigate these findings. In Study 2, the authors manipulate regulatory focus and find that when risks associated with a really new product are not specified to consumers, promotion-focused consumers state higher purchase intentions than prevention-focused consumers. However, when the judgmental context makes the risks salient, prevention- and promotion-focused participants are equally unlikely to purchase the product. Study 3 demonstrates that consumers' self-regulation is unrelated to purchase intentions for products that are not portrayed as new. Mediation analyses in both laboratory Studies show that the effect of regulatory focus on purchase intentions for new products is due to concerns about the performance of the new technology, which are more pronounced among prevention-focused consumers. Finally, the authors discuss managerial implications.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 260
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   I seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion [J].
Aaker, JL ;
Lee, AY .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (01) :33-49
[2]  
[Anonymous], WHY CONSUMPTION CONT
[3]   Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice [J].
Chernev, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 14 (1-2) :141-150
[4]   Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making [J].
Crowe, E ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 69 (02) :117-132
[5]   The role of regulatory focus in the experience and self-control of desire for temptations [J].
Dholakia, UA ;
Gopinath, M ;
Bagozzi, RP ;
Nataraajan, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) :163-175
[6]   When categorization is ambiguous: Factors that facilitate the use of a multiple category inference strategy [J].
Gregan-Paxton, J ;
Hoeffler, S ;
Zhao, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 15 (02) :127-140
[7]   How do consumers transfer existing knowledge? A comparison of analogy and categorization effects [J].
Gregan-Paxton, J ;
Moreau, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) :422-430
[8]   Consumer learning by analogy: A model of internal knowledge transfer [J].
GreganPaxton, J ;
John, DR .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (03) :266-284
[9]   Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle [J].
Higgins, ET .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :1-46
[10]   Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride [J].
Higgins, ET ;
Friedman, RS ;
Harlow, RE ;
Idson, LC ;
Ayduk, ON ;
Taylor, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 31 (01) :3-23