Intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios among high-risk patients

被引:32
作者
Chauhan, Suneet P.
Taylor, Michelle
Shields, Dawn
Parker, Donna
Scardo, James A.
Magann, Everett F.
机构
[1] Aurora Hlth Care, PAC, W Allis, WI 53227 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[3] Spartanburg Reg Med Ctr, Reg Maternal Fetal Ctr, Spartanburg, SC USA
关键词
intrauterine growth restriction; oligohydramnios; small for gestational age;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-972926
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the prevalence of oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index < 5.0 cm) among fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and newborns identified as small for gestational age (SGA), and (2) among fetuses with IUGR, to determine the predictive accuracy of amniotic fluid index (AFI) <= versus > 5.0 cm for adverse peripartum outcomes. This was a retrospective review of high-risk pregnancy that had reliable gestational age (GA) and needed weekly biophysical profile (BPP). Along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), we calculated the likelihood ratios (LRs) and used guidelines promulgated by Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Among the 1859 singletons undergoing BPP, IUGR (estimated fetal weight < 10% for GA) was suspected in 22% (n = 410) and the prevalence of oligohydramnios was 6% (95% CI, 4 to 8%). SGA (birthweight <= 10%) occurred among 28% (n = 517) of newborns and oligohydramnios was noted in 6% (95% Cl, 4 to 8%). Among fetuses with IUGR, the LR of oligohydramnios to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracing was 2.0 (range, 0.8 to 5.0); for newborns small for gestational age, 1.9 (range, 1.2 to 3.1), and for neonatal intensive care unit admission, 1.4 (range, 0.6 to 2.3) More than 90% of patients with IUGR or SGA have AFI > 5.0 cm, and oligohydramnios with IUGR is a poor predictor of peripartum complications.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 221
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A United States national reference for fetal growth [J].
Alexander, GR ;
Himes, JH ;
Kaufman, RB ;
Mor, J ;
Kogan, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) :163-168
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2004, ACOG PRACT B, V58
[3]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1995, ACOG TECHN B
[4]  
[Anonymous], ACOG PRACT B
[5]   The continuing value of the apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. [J].
Casey, BM ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (07) :467-471
[6]   ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME .1. THE RELATIONSHIP OF MARGINAL AND DECREASED AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUMES TO PERINATAL OUTCOME [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, PF ;
MANNING, FA ;
MORRISON, I ;
HARMAN, CR ;
LANGE, IR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 150 (03) :245-249
[7]  
Chauhan S P, 1993, J Perinatol, V13, P186
[8]   Ultrasonographic estimate of birth weight at 24 to 34 weeks: A multicenter study [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Charania, SF ;
McLaren, RK ;
Devoe, LD ;
Ross, EL ;
Hendrix, NW ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (04) :909-916
[9]   Ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid does not reflect actual amniotic fluid volume [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Magann, EF ;
Morrison, JC ;
Whitworth, NS ;
Hendrix, NW ;
Devoe, LD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (02) :291-296
[10]  
CHAUHAN SP, IN PRESS AM J OBSTET