Racial and ethnic disparities in faculty promotion in academic medicine

被引:291
作者
Fang, D [1 ]
Moy, E [1 ]
Colburn, L [1 ]
Hurley, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Washington, DC 20037 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2000年 / 284卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.284.9.1085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Previous studies have suggested that minority medical school faculty are at a disadvantage in promotion opportunities compared with white faculty. Objective To compare promotion rates of minority and white medical school faculty in the United States. Design and Setting Analysis of data from the Association of American Medical Colleges' Faculty Roster System, the official data system for tracking US medical school faculty. Participants A total of 50 145 full-time US medical school faculty who became assistant professors or associate professors between 1980 and 1989. Faculty of historically black and Puerto Rican medical schools were excluded. Main Outcome Measures Attainment of associate or full professorship among assistant professors and full professorship among associate professors by 1997, among white, Asian or Pacific Islander (API), underrepresented minority (URM; including black, Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Native American, and Native Alaskan), and other Hispanic faculty. Results By 1997, 46% of white assistant professors (13479/28953) had been promoted, whereas 37% of API (1123/2997; P<001), 30% of URM (311/1053, P<.001), and 43% of other Hispanic assistant professors (256/598, P=.07) had been promoted. Similarly, by 1997, 50% of white associate professors (7234/14559) had been promoted, whereas 44% of API (629/1419; P<.001), 36% of URM (101/280; P<.001), and 43% of other Hispanic (122/286; P=.02) associate professors had been promoted. Racial/ethnic disparities in promotion were evident among tenure and nontenure faculty and among faculty who received and did not receive National Institutes of Health research awards. After adjusting for-cohort, sex, tenure status, degree, department, medical school type, and receipt of NIH awards, URM faculty remained less likely to be promoted compared with white faculty (relative risk [RR], 0.68 [99% confidence interval {CI}, 0.59-0.77] for assistant professors and 0.81 [99% CI, 0.65-0.99] for associate professors). API assistant professors also were less likely to be promoted (RR, 0.91 [99% CI, 0.84-0.98]), whereas API associate professors and other Hispanic assistant and associate professors were promoted at comparable rates. Conclusion Our data indicate that minority faculty are promoted at lower rates compared with white faculty.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1092
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   MINORITIES IN MEDICINE - PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE [J].
PETERSDORF, RG ;
TURNER, KS ;
NICKENS, HW ;
READY, T .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1990, 65 (11) :663-670
[12]   PROMOTION OF WOMEN PHYSICIANS IN ACADEMIC MEDICINE - GLASS CEILING OR STICKY FLOOR [J].
TESCH, BJ ;
WOOD, HM ;
HELWIG, AL ;
NATTINGER, AB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (13) :1022-1025
[14]   WOMEN ON FACULTIES OF UNITED-STATES MEDICAL-SCHOOLS, 1978-1989 [J].
WHITING, BE ;
BICKEL, J .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1990, 65 (04) :277-278
[15]   What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes [J].
Zhang, J ;
Yu, KF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (19) :1690-1691