Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana)

被引:161
作者
Hillis, DM [1 ]
Wilcox, TP
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sect Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Ctr Computat Biol & Bioinformat, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
phylogeny; Rana; frogs; classification; evolution;
D O I
10.1016/j.ympev.2004.10.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Phylogenetic relationships among the species of true frogs (Rana) from North, South, and Central America were investigated based on the sequences of approximately 2 kb from the mitochondrial genome, sampled from most of the described species, as well as eight undescribed species. This analysis, combined with previous studies of the phylogeny of New World Rana, served as the basis for a revised classification of the group. The American species of Rana are not monophyletic; the western North American Amerana is more closely related to the R. temporaria group of Eurasia (together, these frogs form the group Laurasiarana). The remaining species from the Americas form the monophyletic group Novirana, which includes: R. sylvatica; Aquarana (the R. catesbeiana group); Ranula (the R. palmipes group, including the mostly upland Levirana species and the mostly lowland Lithobates species); Torrentirana (the R. tarahumarae group, or Zweifelia, plus R. sierramadrensis), Stertirana (the R. montezumae group, or Lacusirana, plus R. pipiens), Nenirana (the R. areolata group), and Scurrilirana (most of the southern and tropical leopard frogs). The mitochondrial sequences supported many of the previous hypotheses of relationships of New World Rana, although there were some differences involving the placement of the species R. pipiens, R. sierramadrensis, and R. sylvatica. Parametric bootstrap analyses indicated significant support for the relationships inferred from the mtDNA sequences, and rejected the previous hypotheses of relationships for these three species. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 314
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [61] Rambaut A, 1997, COMPUT APPL BIOSCI, V13, P235
  • [62] SCHAAF RT, 1971, CAT AM AMPHIBIANS RE, V117, P1
  • [63] SCHMIDT RS, 1968, COPEIA, P561
  • [64] Species boundaries, phylogeography and conservation genetics of the red-legged frog (Rana aurora/draytonii) complex
    Shaffer, HB
    Fellers, GM
    Voss, SR
    Oliver, JC
    Pauly, GB
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (09) : 2667 - 2677
  • [65] SMITH HM, 2003, J MARYLAND HERPETOL, V39, P59
  • [66] Swofford D.L., 2011, PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony
  • [67] Swofford David L., 1996, P407
  • [68] CLUSTAL-W - IMPROVING THE SENSITIVITY OF PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT THROUGH SEQUENCE WEIGHTING, POSITION-SPECIFIC GAP PENALTIES AND WEIGHT MATRIX CHOICE
    THOMPSON, JD
    HIGGINS, DG
    GIBSON, TJ
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1994, 22 (22) : 4673 - 4680
  • [69] ALBUMIN DIFFERENCES AMONG RANID FROGS - TAXONOMIC AND PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS
    WALLACE, DG
    KING, MC
    WILSON, AC
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1973, 22 (01): : 1 - 13
  • [70] Webb RG, 1996, SOUTHWEST NAT, V41, P35