An info-gap approach to power and sample size calculations

被引:10
作者
Fox, David R. [1 ]
Ben-Haim, Yakov
Hayes, Keith R.
McCarthy, Michael A.
Wintle, Brendan
Dunstan, Piers
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Australian Ctr Environmetr, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Haifa, Israel
[3] CSIRO, Div Marine Res, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
hypothesis testing; experimental design; environmental monitoring; robustness; parameter uncertainty;
D O I
10.1002/env.811
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Power and sample size calculations are an important but underutilised component of many ecological investigations. A key problem with these calculations is the need to estimate or guess the effect size and error variance (the design parameters) prior to the actual data collection. Furthermore, calculations associated with statistical power and sample size are invariably predicated on normal distribution theory. While the central limit theorem ensures the applicability of normal-based inference for reasonably large sample sizes, the impact of violations of this assumed distributional form in the context of power and sample size determinations is rarely considered. This paper uses information-gap theory to provide sample size guidelines that are robust to uncertainties associated with both the design parameters and distributional form. A simple information-gap approach is developed for one- and two-sided hypothesis tests. The model results quantify the extent to which minimum power demands can be protected from uncertainty by taking additional samples, and demonstrate the importance of the combined effects of standard deviation/effect size ratio and assumed distribution in these considerations. Info-gap theory does not eliminate the need for an initial estimate or best guess of the design parameters or the specification of a parametric distribution from which to compute power. It does, however, measure the degree of insurance provided by additional samples in the face of uncertainties in each of these. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 203
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, EPIDEMIOLOGY RESOUR
[2]  
Ben-Haim Y., 2006, INFO GAP DECISION TH
[3]   Info-gap robust-satisficing model of foraging behavior: Do foragers optimize or satisfice? [J].
Carmel, Y ;
Ben-Haim, Y .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2005, 166 (05) :633-641
[4]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[5]   STATISTICAL POWER AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING [J].
FAIRWEATHER, PG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 1991, 42 (05) :555-567
[6]   Environmental power analysis - a new perspective [J].
Fox, DR .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2001, 12 (05) :437-449
[7]   POWER ANALYSIS AND PRACTICAL STRATEGIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING [J].
GREEN, RH .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 50 (01) :195-205
[8]   The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis [J].
Hoenig, JM ;
Heisey, DM .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (01) :19-24
[9]  
KELLY PJ, 1979, GEOMETRY CONVEXITY
[10]  
Lyles R. H., 1997, J AGR BIOL ENVIR ST, V2, P64, DOI [10.2307/1400641, 10. 2307/1400641]