Current perspectives on HER2 testing:: A review of national testing guidelines

被引:211
作者
Bilous, M
Dowsett, M
Hanna, W
Isola, J
Lebeau, A
Moreno, A
Penault-Llorca, F
Rüschoff, J
Tomasic, G
de Vijver, MV
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Inst Clin Pathol & Med Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, England
[3] Tampere Univ, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[4] LMU Munchen, Inst Pathol, Munich, Germany
[5] Ciutat Santatia Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Ctr Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
[7] Inst Pathol, Kassel, Germany
[8] Inst Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[9] Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
breast cancer; fluorescence in situ hybridization; HER2; immunohistochemistry; testing guidelines;
D O I
10.1097/01.MP.0000052102.90815.82
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Knowledge of HER2 status is a prerequisite when considering a patient's eligibility for Herceptin (trastuzumab) therapy. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential to ensure that all patients who may benefit from Herceptin are correctly identified. There are several assays available to determine HER2 status: the most common in routine clinical practice are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Various factors can affect the results achieved with these assays, including the assay antibody/probe, the methodology and the experience of personnel. Many countries have implemented national testing guidelines in an attempt to standardize testing procedures and make results more accurate. These guidelines vary In the level of detail and the number of recommendations. This review looks at areas of consensus between the different national testing guidelines and highlights where errors may arise during the testing procedure. The key point underlined by this review is that whatever method is used to test for HER2 status, the technology must be validated first, and there must be regular internal and external quality control and quality assurance procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 182
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, Proc Am Soc Oncol
  • [2] [Anonymous], P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL
  • [3] 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
    Bast, RC
    Ravdin, P
    Hayes, DF
    Bates, S
    Fritsche, H
    Jessup, JM
    Kemeny, N
    Locker, GY
    Mennel, RG
    Somerfield, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) : 1865 - 1878
  • [4] BIANCO AR, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA75
  • [5] Predicting HER2 status of breast cancer from basic pathology features: HER2 status of 1500 breast cancers determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridisation with pathology correlation
    Bilous, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 : S52 - S52
  • [6] HER2 testing recommendations in Australia
    Bilous, M
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2001, 33 (04) : 425 - 427
  • [7] Birner P, 2001, CLIN CANCER RES, V7, P1669
  • [8] BLOOM AK, 2000, BREAST CANC RES TREA, V64, P99
  • [9] Evaluation of HER2, p53, bcl-2, topoisomerase II-α, heat shock proteins 27 and 70 in primary breast cancer and metastatic ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes
    Cardoso, F
    Di Leo, A
    Larsimont, D
    Gancberg, D
    Rouas, G
    Dolci, S
    Ferreira, F
    Paesmans, M
    Piccart, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (05) : 615 - 620
  • [10] Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease
    Cobleigh, MA
    Vogel, CL
    Tripathy, D
    Robert, NJ
    Scholl, S
    Fehrenbacher, L
    Wolter, JM
    Paton, V
    Shak, S
    Lieberman, G
    Slamon, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) : 2639 - 2648