Current perspectives on HER2 testing:: A review of national testing guidelines

被引:211
作者
Bilous, M
Dowsett, M
Hanna, W
Isola, J
Lebeau, A
Moreno, A
Penault-Llorca, F
Rüschoff, J
Tomasic, G
de Vijver, MV
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Inst Clin Pathol & Med Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, England
[3] Tampere Univ, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[4] LMU Munchen, Inst Pathol, Munich, Germany
[5] Ciutat Santatia Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Ctr Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
[7] Inst Pathol, Kassel, Germany
[8] Inst Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[9] Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
breast cancer; fluorescence in situ hybridization; HER2; immunohistochemistry; testing guidelines;
D O I
10.1097/01.MP.0000052102.90815.82
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Knowledge of HER2 status is a prerequisite when considering a patient's eligibility for Herceptin (trastuzumab) therapy. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential to ensure that all patients who may benefit from Herceptin are correctly identified. There are several assays available to determine HER2 status: the most common in routine clinical practice are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Various factors can affect the results achieved with these assays, including the assay antibody/probe, the methodology and the experience of personnel. Many countries have implemented national testing guidelines in an attempt to standardize testing procedures and make results more accurate. These guidelines vary In the level of detail and the number of recommendations. This review looks at areas of consensus between the different national testing guidelines and highlights where errors may arise during the testing procedure. The key point underlined by this review is that whatever method is used to test for HER2 status, the technology must be validated first, and there must be regular internal and external quality control and quality assurance procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 182
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [11] Colomer R, 2001, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V69, P242
  • [12] DELAURENTIIS M, 2001, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V20, pA34
  • [13] Current status of HER2 testing
    Di Leo, A
    Dowsett, M
    Horten, B
    Penault-Llorca, F
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2002, 63 : 25 - 32
  • [14] Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: why, when and how?
    Dowsett, M
    Cooke, T
    Ellis, I
    Gullick, WJ
    Gusterson, B
    Mallon, E
    Walker, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [15] Recommendations for HER2 testing in the UK
    Ellis, IO
    Dowsett, M
    Bartlett, J
    Walker, R
    Cooke, T
    Gullick, W
    Gusterson, B
    Mallon, E
    Lee, PB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (12) : 890 - 892
  • [16] Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer:: Evidence from a phase III randomized trial
    Ellis, MJ
    Coop, A
    Singh, B
    Mauriac, L
    Llombert-Cussac, A
    Jänicke, F
    Miller, WR
    Evans, DB
    Dugan, M
    Brady, C
    Quebe-Fehling, E
    Borgs, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (18) : 3808 - 3816
  • [17] Farabegoli F, 1999, INT J CANCER, V84, P273, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990621)84:3<273::AID-IJC13>3.0.CO
  • [18] 2-7
  • [19] Fitzgibbons PL, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P966
  • [20] Sensitivity of HER-2/neu antibodies in archival tissue samples of invasive breast carcinomas - Correlation with oncogene amplification in 160 cases
    Gancberg, D
    Lespagnard, L
    Rouas, G
    Paesmans, M
    Piccart, M
    Di Leo, A
    Nogaret, JM
    Hertens, D
    Verhest, A
    Larsimont, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 113 (05) : 675 - 682