Environmental exposure, DNA methylation, and gene regulation - Lessons from diethylstilbesterol-induced cancers

被引:142
作者
Li, SF
Hursting, SD
Davis, BJ
McLachlan, JA
Barrett, JC
机构
[1] NCI, Lab Biosyst & Canc, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Div Canc Prevent, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NIEHS, Lab Womens Hlth, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Med Ctr, Tulane Xavier Ctr Bioenvironm res, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
来源
EPIGENETICS IN CANCER PREVENTION: EARLY DETECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT | 2003年 / 983卷
关键词
methylation; estrogen; diethylstilbesterol; perinatal exposure; carcinogenesis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb05971.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism that regulates chromosomal stability and gene expression. Abnormal DNA methylation patterns have been observed in many types of human tumors, including those of the breast, prostate, colon, thyroid, stomach, uterus, and cervix. We and others have shown that exposure to a wide variety of xenobiotics during critical periods of mammalian development can persistently alter the pattern of DNA methylation, resulting in potentially adverse biological effects such as aberrant gene expression. Thus, this epigenetic mechanism may underlie the observed increased risk in adulthood of several chronic diseases, including cancer, in response to xenobiotic exposures early in life. We present here the lessons learned from studies on the effects of perinatal diethylstilbesterol (DES) exposure on the methylation pattern of the promoters of several estrogen-responsive genes associated with the development of reproductive organs. Perinatal DES exposure, which induces epithelial tumors of the uterus in mice and is associated with several reproductive tract abnormalities and increased vaginal and cervical cancer risk in women, provides a clear example of how estrogenic xenobiotic exposure during a critical period of development can abnormally demethylate DNA sequences during organ development and possibly increase cancer risk later in life. In addition, nutritional factors and stress may also alter DNA methylation during early life and modulate the risk of cancer and other chronic diseases in adulthood. We suggest that DNA methylation status may be influenced by environmental exposures in early life, leading to increased risk of cancer in adulthood.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 169
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   ALLELE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURES IN THE MOUSE IGF2-H19 DOMAIN [J].
ARIEL, M ;
SELIG, S ;
BRANDEIS, M ;
KITSBERG, D ;
KAFRI, T ;
WEISS, A ;
KESHET, I ;
RAZIN, A ;
CEDAR, H .
COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY, 1993, 58 :307-313
[2]  
BARKER DJP, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1077
[3]   DIETHYLSTILBESTROL INDUCES NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION WITHOUT MEASURABLE GENE MUTATION AT 2 LOCI [J].
BARRETT, JC ;
WONG, A ;
MCLACHLAN, JA .
SCIENCE, 1981, 212 (4501) :1402-1404
[4]   GLUCOCORTICOID EXPOSURE INUTERO - NEW MODEL FOR ADULT HYPERTENSION [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, R ;
LINDSAY, RS ;
NOBLE, J ;
SECKL, JR ;
EDWARDS, CRW .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8841) :339-341
[5]   CLONING OF A MAMMALIAN DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE [J].
BESTOR, TH .
GENE, 1988, 74 (01) :9-12
[6]   In utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure alters Hox gene expression in the developing mullerian system [J].
Block, K ;
Kardana, A ;
Igarashi, P ;
Taylor, HS .
FASEB JOURNAL, 2000, 14 (09) :1101-1108
[7]  
BOUCHARD J, 1983, MOL PHARMACOL, V24, P109
[8]   Environmental signaling:: A biological context for endocrine disruption [J].
Cheek, AO ;
Vonier, PM ;
Oberdörster, E ;
Burow, BC ;
McLachlan, JA .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 106 :5-10
[9]   Estrogen receptor-α knockout mice exhibit resistance to the developmental effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure on the female reproductive tract [J].
Couse, JF ;
Dixon, D ;
Yates, M ;
Moore, AB ;
Ma, L ;
Maas, R ;
Korach, KS .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 238 (02) :224-238
[10]   Dietary selenite and azadeoxycytidine treatments affect dimethylhydrazine-induced aberrant crypt formation in rat colon and DNA methylation in HT-29 cells [J].
Davis, CD ;
Uthus, EO .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2002, 132 (02) :292-297