A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion

被引:79
作者
Creinin, MD
Fox, MC
Teal, S
Chen, A
Schaff, EA
Meyn, LA
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Magee Womens Res Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Univ Rochester, Dept Family Med, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000124271.23499.84
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate equivalence between mifepristone 200 mg followed 6 to 8 hours later and 24 hours later by misoprostol 800 mug vaginally for abortion in women up to 63 days of gestation. METHODS: Mifepristone 200 mg was swallowed by 1,080 women after which they were randomly assigned to self-administer misoprostol intravaginally 6 to 8 hours later (group 1) or 23 to 25 hours later (group 2) at home. Participants returned for an evaluation, including transvaginal ultrasonography, 7 +/- 1 days after initiating treatment. Subjects who had not aborted were offered a second dose of misoprostol. All participants returned approximately 2 weeks after receiving mifepristone. Telephone contact was also attempted approximately 5 weeks after treatment. Treatment was considered a failure if a suction aspiration was performed for any indication. RESULTS: Complete abortion rates for groups I and 2 were 503 of 525 (95.8%, 95% confidence interval 93.7%, 97.3%) and 521 of 531 (98.1%, 95% confidence interval 96.6%, 99.1%), respectively, which were statistically equivalent. Side effects were significantly more common after mifepristone administration for women in group 2. Nausea, vomiting, and heavy bleeding were also significantly greater for women in group 2 after misoprostol treatment. Pain and subject acceptability were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone 200 mg followed 6 to 8 hours later by misoprostol 800 mug vaginally is as effective for abortion and has significantly fewer side effects as compared with regimens using a 24-hour dosing interval. Women receiving mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for abortion can have the flexibility to administer the misoprostol as soon as 6 hours after using the mifepristone. ((C) 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 859
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   An effective regimen for early medical abortion: a report of 2000 consecutive cases [J].
Ashok, PW ;
Penney, GC ;
Flett, GMM ;
Templeton, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (10) :2962-2965
[2]   Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation [J].
Bartley, J ;
Brown, A ;
Elton, R ;
Baird, DT .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (10) :2098-2102
[3]   METHOTREXATE AND MISOPROSTOL VS MISOPROSTOL ALONE FOR EARLY ABORTION - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
CREININ, MD ;
VITTINGHOFF, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (15) :1190-1195
[4]   Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion [J].
Creinin, MD .
CONTRACEPTION, 2000, 62 (03) :117-124
[5]   Efficacy of mifepristone followed on the same day by misoprostol for early termination of pregnancy: report of a randomised trial [J].
Creinin, MD ;
Schwartz, JL ;
Pymar, HC ;
Fink, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (05) :469-473
[6]   STUDIES ON THE MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF PROGESTERONE ANTAGONISTS [J].
ELGER, W ;
BEIER, S ;
CHWALISZ, K ;
FAHNRICH, M ;
HASAN, SH ;
HENDERSON, D ;
NEEF, G ;
ROHDE, R .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1986, 25 (5B) :835-845
[7]   ENDOMETRIAL AND MYOMETRIAL EFFECTS OF PROGESTERONE ANTAGONISTS IN PREGNANT GUINEA-PIGS [J].
ELGER, W ;
FAHNRICH, M ;
BEIER, S ;
QING, SS ;
CHWALISZ, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 157 (04) :1065-1074
[8]   INDUCTION OF ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE (RU-486) AND ORAL OR VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL [J].
ELREFAEY, H ;
RAJASEKAR, D ;
ABDALLA, M ;
CALDER, L ;
TEMPLETON, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (15) :983-987
[9]  
Fisher L.D., 1993, BIOSTATISTICS METHOD
[10]  
Flaherty S A, 1996, AANA J, V64, P133