INDUCTION OF ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE (RU-486) AND ORAL OR VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL

被引:252
作者
ELREFAEY, H
RAJASEKAR, D
ABDALLA, M
CALDER, L
TEMPLETON, A
机构
[1] UNIV ABERDEEN SCH MED,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,ABERDEEN,SCOTLAND
[2] UNIV ABERDEEN SCH MED,HLTH SERV RES UNIT,ABERDEEN,SCOTLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199504133321502
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Medical termination of pregnancy can be successfully performed with a combination of mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare oral with vaginal administration of the prostaglandin E(1), analogue misoprostol for first-trimester abortion in women treated initially with mifepristone. Methods. The study population consisted of 270 women seeking abortion within 63 days after the onset of amenorrhea. The dose of mifepristone was 600 mg, and the dose of misoprostol was 800 mu g. The study had two primary end points: expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure, and abortion within four hours after the administration of misoprostol. Results. Expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure occurred in 95 percent of the women who received misoprostol vaginally and in 87 percent of those who received it orally (P=0.03). The rate of continued pregnancy was 7 percent with the oral regimen and 1 percent with the vaginal regimen (P=0.01). Ninety-three percent of the women receiving misoprostol vaginally had abortions within four hours, as compared with only 78 percent of the women receiving the drug orally (P<0.001). Vomiting and diarrhea were reported more frequently by the women who received oral misoprostol than by those who received vaginal misoprostol (P=0.04 and P=0.002, respectively). Conclusions. After the administration of mifepristone, vaginal administration of misoprostol is more effective and better tolerated than oral administration for the induction of first-trimester abortion.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 987
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Armitage P., 1994, STAT METHODS MED RES, V3
  • [2] AUBENY E, 1991, CR ACAD SCI III-VIE, V312, P539
  • [3] CERVICAL PRIMING WITH PROSTAGLANDIN-E1 ANALOGS, MISOPROSTOL AND GEMEPROST
    ELREFAEY, H
    CALDER, L
    WHEATLEY, DN
    TEMPLETON, A
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 343 (8907) : 1207 - 1209
  • [4] ELREFAEY H, 1994, LANCET, V343, P1650
  • [5] EARLY ABORTION INDUCTION BY A COMBINATION OF MIFEPRISTONE AND ORAL MISOPROSTOL - A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 DOSE REGIMENS OF MISOPROSTOL AND THEIR EFFECT ON BLOOD-PRESSURE
    ELREFAEY, H
    TEMPLETON, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (09): : 792 - 796
  • [6] EARLY INDUCTION OF ABORTION BY A COMBINATION OF ORAL MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL ADMINISTERED BY THE VAGINAL ROUTE
    ELREFAEY, H
    TEMPLETON, A
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 49 (02) : 111 - 114
  • [7] Fonseca W, 1993, Clin Dysmorphol, V2, P76
  • [8] LIMB DEFICIENCY WITH OR WITHOUT MOBIUS SEQUENCE IN 7 BRAZILIAN CHILDREN ASSOCIATED WITH MISOPROSTOL USE IN THE 1ST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY
    GONZALEZ, CH
    VARGAS, FR
    PEREZ, ABA
    KIM, CA
    BRUNONI, D
    MARQUESDIAS, MJ
    LEONE, CR
    NETO, JC
    LLERENA, JC
    DEALMEIDA, JCC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1993, 47 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [9] INDUCED-ABORTION - A WORLD REVIEW, 1990
    HENSHAW, SK
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1990, 22 (02): : 76 - 89
  • [10] HENSHAW SK, 1990, FAM PLANN PERSPECT, V22, P114