Evaluations of molecular docking programs for virtual screening

被引:143
作者
Onodera, Kenji
Satou, Kazuhito
Hirota, Hiroshi
机构
[1] RIKEN, Genom Sci Ctr, Tsurumi Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2300045, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Inst Ind Sci, Tokyo 153, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci7000378
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Structure-based virtual screening is carried out using molecular docking programs. A number of such docking programs are currently available, and the selection of docking program is difficult without knowing the characteristics or performance of each program. In this study, the screening performances of three molecular docking programs, DOCK, AutoDock, and GOLD, were evaluated with 116 target proteins. The screening performances were validated using two novel standards, along with a traditional enrichment rate measurement. For the evaluations, each docking run was repeated 1000 times with three initial conformations of a ligand. While each docking program has some merit over the other docking programs in some aspects, DOCK showed an unexpectedly better screening performance in the enrichment rates. Finally, we made several recommendations based on the evaluation results to enhance the screening performances of the docking programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1609 / 1618
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] ICM - A NEW METHOD FOR PROTEIN MODELING AND DESIGN - APPLICATIONS TO DOCKING AND STRUCTURE PREDICTION FROM THE DISTORTED NATIVE CONFORMATION
    ABAGYAN, R
    TOTROV, M
    KUZNETSOV, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 15 (05) : 488 - 506
  • [2] Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking
    Bursulaya, BD
    Totrov, M
    Abagyan, R
    Brooks, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2003, 17 (11) : 755 - 763
  • [3] *CAMBR CRYST DAT C, 2006, GOLD VERS 3 0
  • [4] Evaluating molecular-docking methods for pose prediction and enrichment factors
    Chen, HM
    Lyne, PD
    Giordanetto, F
    Lovell, T
    Li, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2006, 46 (01) : 401 - 415
  • [5] Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult
    Cole, JC
    Murray, CW
    Nissink, JWM
    Taylor, RD
    Taylor, R
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (03) : 325 - 332
  • [6] DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases
    Ewing, TJA
    Makino, S
    Skillman, AG
    Kuntz, ID
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (05) : 411 - 428
  • [7] Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy
    Friesner, RA
    Banks, JL
    Murphy, RB
    Halgren, TA
    Klicic, JJ
    Mainz, DT
    Repasky, MP
    Knoll, EH
    Shelley, M
    Perry, JK
    Shaw, DE
    Francis, P
    Shenkin, PS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) : 1739 - 1749
  • [8] Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques
    Good, AC
    Cheney, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2003, 22 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [9] Decoys for docking
    Graves, AP
    Brenk, R
    Shoichet, BK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 48 (11) : 3714 - 3728
  • [10] Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking
    Jain, Ajay N.
    [J]. CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE, 2006, 7 (05) : 407 - 420