Feedback stabilization of nonaxisymmetric resistive wall modes in tokamaks. II. Control analysis

被引:49
作者
Fransson, CM [1 ]
Lennartson, B
Breitholtz, C
Bondeson, A
Liu, YQ
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Signals & Syst, Control & Automat Lab, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, EURATOM NFR Fus Assoc, Dept Electromagnet, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.1290481
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Active feedback of nonaxisymmetric resistive wall modes in tokamaks is investigated using control theory. Control systems are designed to stabilize the resistive wall mode of toroidal mode number n=1 and meet certain performance specifications for a set of test equilibria. The response of the plasma and resistive wall is described by low order rational functions from an electromagnetic model [Y. Q. Liu , Phys. Plasmas 7, 3681 (2000)]. Simple coil arrangements are assumed, both for the sensor and feedback coil arrays, and the sensors detect the perturbed poloidal field. The active coils are modeled both as broad strips and as thin wires, and several different controllers: P (proportional), PD (proportional plus derivative) and H-infinity are investigated. An important parameter is the ratio, tau, of control system response time to the resistive wall time, and the analysis shows the restrictions on this ratio for acceptable performance. For an equilibrium that exceeds the no-wall beta limit by 63%, good control with broad strips and a PD controller is possible for tau less than or similar to 5.4, while thin-wire coils require tau less than or similar to 2.1. H-infinity controllers give some improvement for thin wires and about a factor of 2 increase in tau for broad strips. The upper limit in tau decreases with increasing pressure. A control system designed to stabilize a certain pressure generally works well at lower pressures. (C) 2000 American Institute of Physics. [S1070-664X(00)04110-0].
引用
收藏
页码:4143 / 4151
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Higher fusion power gain with current and pressure profile control in strongly shaped DIII-D tokamak plasmas [J].
Lazarus, EA ;
Navratil, GA ;
Greenfield, CM ;
Strait, EJ ;
Austin, ME ;
Burrell, KH ;
Casper, TA ;
Baker, DR ;
DeBoo, JC ;
Doyle, EJ ;
Durst, R ;
Ferron, JR ;
Forest, CB ;
Gohil, P ;
Groebner, RJ ;
Heidbrink, WW ;
Hong, RM ;
Houlberg, WA ;
Howald, AW ;
Hsieh, CL ;
Hyatt, AW ;
Jackson, GL ;
Kim, J ;
Lao, LL ;
Lasnier, CJ ;
Leonard, AW ;
Lohr, J ;
LaHaye, RJ ;
Maingi, R ;
Miller, RL ;
Murakami, M ;
Osborne, TH ;
Perkins, LJ ;
Petty, CC ;
Rettig, CL ;
Rhodes, TL ;
Rice, BW ;
Sabbagh, SA ;
Schissel, DP ;
Scoville, JT ;
Snider, RT ;
Staebler, GM ;
Stallard, BW ;
Stambaugh, RD ;
StJohn, HE ;
Stockdale, RE ;
Taylor, PL ;
Thomas, DM ;
Turnbull, AD ;
Wade, MR .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 77 (13) :2714-2717
[22]   CONTROL OF THE VERTICAL INSTABILITY IN TOKAMAKS [J].
LAZARUS, EA ;
LISTER, JB ;
NEILSON, GH .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1990, 30 (01) :111-141
[23]  
Lennartson B, 1997, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P2666, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1997.657783
[24]   Active feedback stabilization of toroidal external modes in tokamaks [J].
Liu, YQ ;
Bondeson, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 84 (05) :907-910
[25]   Feedback stabilization of nonaxisymmetric resistive wall modes in tokamaks. I. Electromagnetic model [J].
Liu, YQ ;
Bondeson, A ;
Fransson, CM ;
Lennartson, B ;
Breitholtz, C .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2000, 7 (09) :3681-3690
[26]  
Maciejowski J., 1989, Multivariable Feedback Design Electronic Systems Engineering Series
[27]  
*MATHW, 1996, MATL OPT TOOLB
[28]   A LOOP SHAPING DESIGN PROCEDURE USING H-INFINITY-SYNTHESIS [J].
MCFARLANE, D ;
GLOVER, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1992, 37 (06) :759-769
[29]   Circuit equation formulation of resistive wall mode feedback stabilization schemes [J].
Okabayashi, M ;
Pomphrey, N ;
Hatcher, RE .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1998, 38 (11) :1607-1627
[30]  
OKABAYASHI M, 1999, P 26 EPS C CONTR F J, V23, P1661