Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on

被引:628
作者
Djulbegovic, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guyatt, Gordon H. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Program Comparat Effectiveness Res, Dept Internal Med, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Div Evidence Based Med, Dept Internal Med, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Tampa Gen Hosp, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; USERS GUIDES; QUALITY; CARE; GRADE; BIAS; RECOMMENDATIONS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In response to limitations in the understanding and use of published evidence, evidence-based medicine (EBM) began as a movement in the early 1990s. EBM's initial focus was on educating clinicians in the understanding and use of published literature to optimise clinical care, including the science of systematic reviews. EBM progressed to recognise limitations of evidence alone, and has increasingly stressed the need to combine critical appraisal of the evidence with patient's values and preferences through shared decision making. In another progress, EBM incorporated and further developed the science of producing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines pioneered by investigators in the 1980s. EBM's enduring contributions to clinical medicine include placing the practice of medicine on a solid scientific basis, the development of more sophisticated hierarchies of evidence, the recognition of the crucial role of patient values and preferences in clinical decision making, and the development of the methodology for generating trustworthy recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 423
页数:9
相关论文
共 111 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Medicine (Baltimore), P2
[12]  
[Anonymous], Public Health, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0033-3506(02)00027-6
[13]   Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical [J].
Antes, G ;
Chalmers, I .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9362) :978-979
[14]  
Appelt KC, 2011, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V6, P252
[15]   Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations -: I:: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group -: art. no. 38 [J].
Atkins, D ;
Eccles, M ;
Flottorp, S ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Henry, D ;
Hill, S ;
Liberati, A ;
O'Connell, D ;
Oxman, AD ;
Phillips, B ;
Schünemann, H ;
Edejer, TTT ;
Vist, GE ;
Williams, JW .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 4 (1)
[16]  
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[17]   Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? [J].
Bastian, Hilda ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
Chalmers, Iain .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (09)
[18]   Grading a Physician's Value - The Misapplication of Performance Measurement [J].
Berenson, Robert A. ;
Kaye, Deborah R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (22) :2079-2081
[19]  
Carrasco-Labra A, 2014, USERS GUIDES MED LIT
[20]  
Chalmers I, 2005, CLIN TRIALS, V2, P229