Response rates for mail surveys of nonprofit organizations: A review and empirical test

被引:138
作者
Hager, MA [1 ]
Wilson, S
Pollak, TH
Rooney, PM
机构
[1] Urban Inst, Ctr Nonprofits & Philanthropy, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] United Way Amer, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Ctr Philanthropy, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
survey research; response rates; nonprofit organizations;
D O I
10.1177/0899764003032002005
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The failure of a substantial portion of mail survey recipients to respond to invitations to participate in research projects raises issues of nonresponse error. Because this error is difficult to quantify, survey researchers seek high rates of return to signal legitimacy and reduce questions regarding nonresponse bias. Research on survey method indicates that the design of the survey research process has a measurable influence on the rate of survey returns. This article focuses on three aspects of research design that are expected to influence mail survey returns in surveys of nonprofit organizations: questionnaire complexity, use of Federal Express versus standard mail, and the use of monetary incentives. Using an experimental design, the research concludes that questionnaire complexity and the use of monetary incentives generate no difference in returns, whereas the use of Federal Express to deliver the survey to nonprofit executives has a measurable positive effect.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 267
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Likelihood of participating in mail survey research - Business respondents' perspectives [J].
Greer, TV ;
Chuchinprakarn, R ;
Seshadri, S .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2000, 29 (02) :97-109
[22]  
Gronbjerg K. A., 1994, Voluntas, V5, P301
[23]   Mapping small religious nonprofit organizations: An Illinois profile [J].
Gronbjerg, KA ;
Nelson, S .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 1998, 27 (01) :13-31
[24]   Big fights: Competition between poor people's social movement organizations [J].
Hall, LM ;
Hall, MF .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 1996, 25 (01) :53-72
[25]  
HAYCOCK N, 1992, NONPROFIT SECTOR NEW
[26]  
HENIG JR, 1995, NONPROFITS RISK ASSE
[27]   THE EFFECT OF MONETARY INCENTIVES AND FOLLOW-UP MAILINGS ON THE RESPONSE RATE AND RESPONSE QUALITY IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
JAMES, JM ;
BOLSTEIN, R .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1990, 54 (03) :346-361
[28]  
Jobber D, 1989, INT J RES MARK, V6, P129
[29]   Challenges in survey research and their implications for philanthropic studies research [J].
Kennedy, JM ;
Vargus, B .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2001, 30 (03) :483-494
[30]   Charity begins at home: Family firms and patterns of community involvement [J].
Litz, RA ;
Stewart, AC .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2000, 29 (01) :131-148