Electrophysiological evaluation of human brain development

被引:75
作者
Picton, Terence W.
Taylor, Margot J.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
关键词
EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; AUDITORY-SYSTEM ACTIVITY; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; RECOGNITION MEMORY; 1ST YEAR; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; STEM RESPONSE; FAMILIAL RISK; FACE RECOGNITION; N1; WAVE;
D O I
10.1080/87565640701228732
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The complex development of the human brain during infancy can only be understood by convergent structural, functional, and behavioral measurements. The evaluation of event-related potentials (ERPs) is the most effective current way to look at infant brain function. ERP paradigms can be used to examine the simple transmission of sensory information to the cortex and the discrimination of this information within the cortex. The main developmental changes involve localization of function as the brain becomes tuned to the experienced world (related to synaptic pruning) and a speeding up of transmission as pathways become efficient (related to myelination). ERPs that occur in relation to different temporal aspects of a stimulus (onset-responses, offset-responses, sustained potentials and steady-state responses) and ERPs recorded at different stimulus rates may help track perceptual development from a temporal perspective. Particularly important in human development are the ERP changes that occur in the processing of speech sounds and human faces. At present, ERP studies can show differences between groups of subjects that can demonstrate developmental disorders or elucidate mechanisms of development. However, because of their variability, ERPs are less helpful in determining whether an individual infant is developing abnormally. Where possible, ERP measurements should be used in conjunction with behavioral tests so as to relate performance to mechanism, and with anatomical brain measurements to relate mechanism to structure.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 278
页数:30
相关论文
共 133 条
[121]  
TAYLOR MJ, 1993, EVOKED POTENTIALS CL, P489
[122]   Assessing brain development using neurophysiologic and behavioral measures [J].
Thomas, KM .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2003, 143 (04) :S46-S53
[123]   Maturation of human central auditory system activity: the T-complex [J].
Tonnquist-Uhlen, I ;
Ponton, CW ;
Eggermont, JJ ;
Kwong, B ;
Don, M .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (04) :685-701
[124]   TOPOGRAPHY OF AUDITORY-EVOKED LONG-LATENCY POTENTIALS IN NORMAL-CHILDREN, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE N1 COMPONENT [J].
TONNQUISTUHLEN, I ;
BORG, E ;
SPENS, KE .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 95 (01) :34-41
[125]   Changes in auditory cortex and the development of mismatch negativity between 2 and 6 months of age [J].
Trainor, L ;
McFadden, M ;
Hodgson, L ;
Darragh, L ;
Barlow, J ;
Matsos, L ;
Sonnadara, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 51 (01) :5-15
[126]   Measuring temporal resolution in infants using mismatch negativity [J].
Trainor, LJ ;
Samuel, SS ;
Desjardins, RN ;
Sonnadara, RR .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (11) :2443-2448
[127]   Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study [J].
Tsao, FM ;
Liu, HM ;
Kuhl, PK .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 75 (04) :1067-1084
[128]   Nutritional effects on auditory brainstem maturation in healthy term infants [J].
Ünay, B ;
Sarici, SÜ ;
Ulas, ÜH ;
Akin, R ;
Alpay, F ;
Gökçay, E .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2004, 89 (02) :177-179
[129]   Perceptual priming for upright and inverted faces in infants and adults [J].
Webb, SJ ;
Nelson, CA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 79 (01) :1-22
[130]   Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: electrophysiological evidence [J].
Weber, C ;
Hahne, A ;
Friedrich, M ;
Friederici, AD .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (02) :149-161