Effect of oral sucralfate on late rectal injury associated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A double-blind, randomized trial

被引:26
作者
Kneebone, A
Mameghan, H
Bolin, T
Berry, M
Turner, S
Kearsley, J
Graham, P
Fisher, R
Delaney, G
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Canc Therapy Ctr, Liverpool, NSW 1871, Australia
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[3] Prince Wales Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[5] Westmead Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[6] St George Hosp, Canc Care Ctr, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 60卷 / 04期
关键词
radiotherapy; prostate cancer; sucralfate; rectal injury;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.033
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess whether oral sucralfate is effective in preventing late rectal injury in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted across four institutions in Australia. Patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer were randomized to receive either 3 g of oral sucralfate suspension or placebo twice daily. Data on patients' symptoms were collected for 2 years, and flexible sigmoidoscopy was scheduled at 12 months after treatment. Results: A total of 338 patients were randomized, of whom 298 had adequate follow-up data available for an analysis of late symptoms. Of the 298 patients, 143 were randomized to receive sucralfate and 155 placebo. The cumulative incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 2 or worse late rectal toxicity at 2 years was 28% for placebo and 22% for the sucralfate arm (p = 0.23; 95% confidence interval for the difference -3% to 16%). Seventeen percent of patients in the sucralfate group had significant bleeding (Grade 2 or worse) compared with 23% in the placebo group (p = 0.18, 95% confidence interval -15% to 3%). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to bowel frequency (p = 0.99), mucus discharge (p = 0.64), or fecal incontinence (p = 0.90). Sigmoidoscopy findings showed a nonstatistically significant reduction in Grade 2 or worse rectal changes from 32% with placebo to 27% in the sucralfate group (P = 0.25). Conclusion: This trial demonstrated no statistically significant reduction in the incidence of late rectal toxicity in patients randomized to receive sucralfate. However, this result was considered inconclusive, because the trial was unable to exclude clinically important differences in the late toxicity rates. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1097
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   Sucralfate for radiation mucositis: Results of a double-blind randomized trial [J].
Meredith, R ;
Salter, M ;
Kim, R ;
Spencer, S ;
Weppelmann, B ;
Rodu, B ;
Smith, J ;
Lee, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (02) :275-279
[12]   Acute symptoms, not rectally administered sucralfate, predict for late radiation proctitis: Longer term follow-up of a phase III Trial-Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group [J].
O'Brien, PC ;
Franklin, CI ;
Poulsen, MG ;
Joseph, DJ ;
Spry, NS ;
Denham, JW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02) :442-449
[13]   A phase III double-blind randomised study of rectal sucralfate suspension in the prevention of acute radiation proctitis [J].
OBrien, PC ;
Franklin, CI ;
Dear, KBG ;
Hamilton, CC ;
Poulsen, M ;
Joseph, DJ ;
Spry, N ;
Denham, JW .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 45 (02) :117-123
[14]   EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC SUCRALFATE SUSPENSION ON STOMATITIS INDUCED BY CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND CROSS-OVER STUDY [J].
PFEIFFER, P ;
MADSEN, EL ;
HANSEN, O ;
MAY, O .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1990, 29 (02) :171-173
[15]   Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial [J].
Pollack, A ;
Zagars, GK ;
Starkschall, G ;
Antolak, JA ;
Lee, JJ ;
Huang, E ;
von Eschenbach, AC ;
Kuban, DA ;
Rosen, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05) :1097-1105
[16]   External beam radiotherapy for stage T1/T2 prostate cancer: How does it stack up? [J].
Pollack, A ;
Zagars, GK .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (02) :258-264
[17]   ORAL SUCRALFATE IN ACUTE RADIATION ESOPHAGITIS [J].
SUR, RK ;
KOCHHAR, R ;
SINGH, DP .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1994, 33 (01) :61-63
[18]   PATHWAYS OF GASTROINTESTINAL PROTECTION AND REPAIR - MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF SUCRALFATE [J].
SZABO, S ;
HOLLANDER, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 86 (6A) :23-31
[19]  
SZABO S, 1991, AM J MED, V91, P158
[20]   DOES SUCRALFATE AFFECT THE NORMAL GASTRIC-MUCOSA - HISTOLOGIC, ULTRASTRUCTURAL, AND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT IN THE RAT [J].
TARNAWSKI, A ;
HOLLANDER, D ;
KRAUSE, WJ ;
ZIPSER, RD ;
STACHURA, J ;
GERGELY, H .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 90 (04) :893-905