Mitigating CO2 emission in pulverized coal-fired power plant via co-firing ammonia: A simulation study of flue gas streams and exergy efficiency

被引:146
作者
Xu, Yishu [1 ]
Wang, Huakun [1 ]
Liu, Xiaowei [1 ]
Zhu, Jingji [1 ]
Xu, Jingying [1 ]
Xu, Minghou [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ammonia co-firing; Coal-fired power plant; Exergy analysis; CO2; Flue gas; LAMINAR FLAME PROPAGATION; COMBUSTION; CAPTURE; STEAM; TECHNOLOGY; BIOMASS; ENERGY; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115328
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
070201 [理论物理];
摘要
Coal-fired power plants are one of the major sources of CO2 emission, and the novel application of directly co firing the carbon-free fuel ammonia into the coal-fired power plants is emerging as a promising method of CO2 emission reduction. In this study, simulations of the boiler system of a 600 MWe coal-fired power plant unit were performed in both coal-fired condition and ammonia-coal co-firing conditions, and the impacts of ammonia co firing on the emission and thermal properties of flue gas, exergy loss, and exergy efficiency were analyzed. Two co-firing scenarios (identical adiabatic flame temperature scenario and identical excess air coefficient scenario) were compared, both assuming that the total heating value of the fuel into the furnace kept unchanged with different ammonia co-firing ratios (5%, 10%, 15%, 20% on heating value basis). The results showed that CO2 emission was effectively reduced by 24.08 t/h for every 5% increase in the ammonia co-firing ratio. The amount of total flue gas was also reduced while both the content and the emission rate of H2O were increased with ammonia co-firing. Consequently, the specific heat capacity of flue gas increased and further changed its temperature distribution profile. Compared with the coal-fired base case, the exergy loss in the furnace under the ammonia co-firing conditions increased continuously as the ammonia co-firing ratio increased, suggesting that the irreversible loss of the ammonia combustion process was greater than that of coal. By contrast, the exergy loss of heat exchangers and fans decreased in ammonia co-firing conditions. Finally, the exergy efficiency of the boiler system was only slightly reduced (53.82% vs. 53.27%-53.22%) in ammonia co-firing conditions, showing that co-firing ammonia in coal-fired power plant would not significantly deteriorate the thermal economy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]
Exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of a cogeneration plant system using Multimodal Genetic Algorithm (MGA) [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) :5161-5172
[2]
Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan [J].
Aijundi, Isam H. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (2-3) :324-328
[3]
[Anonymous], GETTING STARTED MODE
[5]
Bejan Adrian., 1995, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[6]
The effect of ammonia co-firing on NO heterogeneous reduction in the high-temperature reduction zone of coal air-staging combustion: Experimental and quantum chemistry study [J].
Chen, Ping ;
Fang, Yao ;
Wang, Peipei ;
Gu, Mingyan ;
Luo, Kun ;
Fan, Jianren .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2022, 237
[7]
Experimental and theoretical calculations study on heterogeneous reduction of NO by char/NH3 in the reduction zone of ammonia co-firing with pulverized coal: Influence of mineral Fe [J].
Chen, Ping ;
Jiang, Boyu ;
Wang, Huichun ;
Gu, Mingyan ;
Fang, Yao ;
Wang, Peipei .
FUEL, 2022, 310
[8]
Study of effects of ammonia addition on soot formation characteristics in n-heptane co-flow laminar diffusion flames [J].
Cheng, Xiaobei ;
Li, Yu ;
Xu, Yishu ;
Liu, Yang ;
Wang, Bowen .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2022, 235
[9]
Daniel J.J., 2002, EXERGY INT J, V2, P283, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1164-0235(02)00076-6
[10]
ASPEN Plus simulation of coal integrated gasification combined blast furnace slag waste heat recovery system [J].
Duan, Wenjun ;
Yu, Qingbo ;
Wang, Kun ;
Qin, Qin ;
Hou, Limin ;
Yao, Xin ;
Wu, Tianwei .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 100 :30-36