Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray-scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography

被引:84
作者
Järvelä, IY [1 ]
Sladkevicius, P
Tekay, AH
Campbell, S
Nargund, G
机构
[1] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Oulu, Finland
[2] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, Diana Princess Wales Ctr Reprod Med, Acad Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] Univ Sjukhuse MAS, Kvinnokliniken, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Doppler ultrasound; inter-CC; intra-CC; limits of agreement; repeatability coefficient;
D O I
10.1002/uog.62
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess intraobserver and interobserver variability in ovarian volume and gray-scale and color flow index measurements using transvaginal, three-dimensional, power Doppler ultrasonography. Methods Eleven women (22 ovaries) were examined on day 8 of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation therapy, which was part of their in vitro fertilization treatment protocol. The patients were examined twice by the first observer and once by the second observer. The acquired volume datasets were analyzed using the VOCAL(TM) imaging program, enabling the assessment of ovarian volume, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), vascularization flow index (VFI) and mean grayness (MG). For these parameters the intraclass (intra-CC) and interclass (inter-CC) correlation coefficients, within-observer and between-observers repeatability coefficient (r) and limits of agreement were calculated. Results Both intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ovarian volume measurements were considered very good with an intra-CC value of 1.00 and inter-CC value of 0.99, respectively. Also VI, FI, VFI and MG measurements were repeatable by a single observer, the intra-CC ranging from 0.82 to 0.91. The interobserver reproducibility was also good for VI, VFI and MG measurements (inter-CC values 0.73, 0.70 and 0.81, respectively), but for FI measurements the reproducibility was poor (inter-CC = 0.29, r = 7.87). Conclusions In general, the intraobserver reproducibility was better than interobserver reproducibility for all parameters. The volume assessments were reproducible both by one observer and by two separate observers. The intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were acceptable for VI, VFI and MG, whereas for FI the interobserver reproducibility was poor. Our results suggest that measurement of gray-scale and color Doppler flow indices is reproducible thus allowing them to be used in clinical practice and research. Copyright (C) 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 282
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Ovarian stromal echogenicity in women with clomiphene citrate-sensitive and clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome [J].
Al-Took, S ;
Watkin, K ;
Tulandi, T ;
Tan, SL .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (05) :952-954
[2]   Quantification of power Doppler energy and its future potential [J].
Amso, NN ;
Watermeyer, SR ;
Pugh, N ;
O'Brien, S ;
D'Angelo, A .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) :583-587
[3]   The use of transvaginal power Doppler ultrasonography to evaluate the relationship between perifollicular vascularity and outcome in in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles [J].
Bhal, PS ;
Pugh, ND ;
Chui, DK ;
Gregory, L ;
Walker, SM ;
Shaw, RW .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (04) :939-945
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Reproducibility and repeatability of transabdominal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation [J].
Hollis, B ;
Mavrides, E ;
Campbell, S ;
Tekay, A ;
Thilaganathan, B .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (06) :593-597
[6]  
Homburg R, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P29
[7]   INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS INSTRUMENT SETTINGS ON THE FLOW INFORMATION DERIVED FROM THE POWER MODE [J].
JAIN, SP ;
FAN, PH ;
PHILPOT, EF ;
NANDA, NC ;
AGGARWAL, KK ;
MOOS, S ;
YOGANATHAN, AP .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (01) :49-54
[8]  
Kupesic S, 2001, J ULTRAS MED, V20, P125
[9]   The assessment of ovarian tumor angiogenesis: what does three-dimensional power Doppler add? [J].
Kurjak, A ;
Kupesic, S ;
Breyer, B ;
Sparac, V ;
Jukic, S .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) :136-146
[10]   Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: Accuracy of follicular volume measurements [J].
KyeiMensah, A ;
Zaidi, J ;
Pittrof, R ;
Shaker, A ;
Campbell, S ;
Tan, SL .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (02) :371-376