Assessing the utility of indicator groups for the conservation of South American terrestrial mammals

被引:48
作者
Tognelli, MF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Wildlife Fish & Conservat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
conservation planning; complementary networks; South American mammals; indicator species;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Because data on the distribution of most species are limited, prioritizing sites for conservation requires the use of indicator groups to represent overall diversity. The purpose of this study is to assess the utility of different subsets of the South American mammal fauna in representing the overall diversity of South American terrestrial mammals, percentage of endangered and restricted-range species, and the percentage of monotypic genera. Particularly, I assess the effectiveness and efficiency of explicitly selected indicator groups at two spatial scales - continental South America and the country of Brazil. Results show that all indicator groups were more effective than a random selection of cells. However, when compared with sets of randomly selected species, only one indicator group outperformed these sets. An indicator group composed of geographically rare species was more effective and efficient at both spatial scales, protecting a higher percentage of the total number of species, as well as higher percentages of endangered and rare species, and total number of monotypic genera. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 417
页数:9
相关论文
共 117 条
[101]   EFFECT OF THE FOCAL TAXON ON THE SELECTION OF NATURE-RESERVES [J].
RYTI, RT .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1992, 2 (04) :404-410
[102]   Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Quebec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis [J].
Sarakinos, H ;
Nicholls, AO ;
Tubert, A ;
Aggarwal, A ;
Margules, CR ;
Sarkar, S .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2001, 10 (09) :1419-1472
[103]   Place prioritization for biodiversity content [J].
Sarkar, S ;
Aggarwal, A ;
Garson, J ;
Margules, CR ;
Zeidler, J .
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2002, 27 (04) :339-346
[104]   Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passe in the landscape era? [J].
Simberloff, D .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 83 (03) :247-257
[105]  
TIRIRA D, 1999, MAMIFEROS ECUDADOR 2
[106]  
Tognelli Marcelo F., 2001, Mammalian Species, V648, P1, DOI 10.1644/1545-1410(2001)648<0001:MA>2.0.CO
[107]  
2
[108]  
Torres-Mura Juan C., 1998, Mammalian Species, V594, P1
[109]   Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies [J].
van Jaarsveld, AS ;
Freitag, S ;
Chown, SL ;
Muller, C ;
Koch, S ;
Hull, H ;
Bellamy, C ;
Krüger, M ;
Endrödy-Younga, S ;
Mansell, MW ;
Scholtz, CH .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2106-2108
[110]   WHAT TO PROTECT - SYSTEMATICS AND THE AGONY OF CHOICE [J].
VANEWRIGHT, RI ;
HUMPHRIES, CJ ;
WILLIAMS, PH .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1991, 55 (03) :235-254