Amino acid empirical contact energy definitions for fold recognition in the space of contact maps

被引:76
作者
Berrera, M
Molinari, H
Fogolari, F
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dipartimento Sci & Tecnol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Scuola Int Super Studi Avanzati, I-34014 Trieste, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-4-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Contradicting evidence has been presented in the literature concerning the effectiveness of empirical contact energies for fold recognition. Empirical contact energies are calculated on the basis of information available from selected protein structures, with respect to a defined reference state, according to the quasi-chemical approximation. Protein-solvent interactions are estimated from residue solvent accessibility. Results: In the approach presented here, contact energies are derived from the potential of mean force theory, several definitions of contact are examined and their performance in fold recognition is evaluated on sets of decoy structures. The best definition of contact is tested, on a more realistic scenario, on all predictions including sidechains accepted in the CASP4 experiment. In 30 out of 35 cases the native structure is correctly recognized and best predictions are usually found among the 10 lowest energy predictions. Conclusion: The definition of contact based on van der Waals radii of alpha carbon and side chain heavy atoms is seen to perform better than other definitions involving only alpha carbons, only beta carbons, all heavy atoms or only backbone atoms. An important prerequisite for the applicability of the approach is that the protein structure under study should not exhibit anomalous solvent accessibility, compared to soluble proteins whose structure is deposited in the Protein Data Bank. The combined evaluation of a solvent accessibility parameter and contact energy allows for an effective gross screening of predictive models.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   PRINCIPLES THAT GOVERN FOLDING OF PROTEIN CHAINS [J].
ANFINSEN, CB .
SCIENCE, 1973, 181 (4096) :223-230
[2]   Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: Are these meaningful potentials? [J].
BenNaim, A .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 107 (09) :3698-3706
[3]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[4]   Ab initio protein structure prediction: Progress and prospects [J].
Bonneau, R ;
Baker, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 2001, 30 :173-189
[5]   Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations [J].
Fariselli, P ;
Olmea, O ;
Valencia, A ;
Casadio, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2001, :157-162
[6]  
Fariselli P, 2000, Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol, V8, P146
[7]   Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the surface generalized born solvent model [J].
Felts, AK ;
Gallicchio, E ;
Wallqvist, A ;
Levy, RM .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 48 (02) :404-422
[8]   A critical analysis of continuum electrostatics: the screened Coulomb potential-implicit solvent model and the study of the alanine dipeptide and discrimination of misfolded structures of proteins [J].
Hassan, SA ;
Mehler, EL .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2002, 47 (01) :45-61
[9]  
Hill T., 1956, INTRO STAT MECH
[10]  
HOBOHM U, 1994, PROTEIN SCI, V3, P522