Molecular mechanics calculations of proteins. Comparison of different energy minimization strategies

被引:19
作者
Christensen, IT [1 ]
Jorgensen, FS [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Danish Sch Pharm, Dept Med Chem, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1080/07391102.1997.10508959
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A general strategy for performing energy minimization of proteins using the SYBYL molecular modelling program has been developed. The influence of several variables including energy minimization procedure, solvation, dielectric function and dielectric constant have been investigated in order to develop a general method, which is capable of producing high quality protein structures. Avian pancreatic polypeptide (APP) and bovine pancreatic phospholipase A2 (BP PLA2) were selected for the calculations, because high quality X-ray structures exist and because all classes of secondary structure are represented in the structures. The energy minimized structures were evaluated relative to the corresponding X-ray structures. The overall similarity was checked by calculating KMS distances for all atom positions. Backbone conformation was checked by Ramachandran plots and secondary structure elements evaluated by the length on hydrogen bonds. The dimensions of active site in BP PLA2 is very dependent on electrostatic interactions, due to the presence of the positively charged calcium ion. Thus, the distances between calcium and the calcium-coordinating groups were used as a quality index for this protein. Energy minimized structures of the trimeric PLA2 from Indian cobra (N.n.n. PLA2) were used for assessing the impact of protein-protein interactions. Based on the above mentioned criteria, it could be concluded that using the following conditions: Dielectric constant epsilon = 4 or 20; a distance dependent dielectric function and stepwise energy minimization, it is possible to reproduce X-ray structures very accurately without including explicit solvent molecules.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[41]   WATER-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS - THEORY AND EXPERIMENT [J].
TEETER, MM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 20 :577-600
[42]  
Thrige DD, 1997, BIOPOLYMERS, V42, P319
[43]   SURFACE-AREA INCLUDED IN ENERGY REFINEMENT OF PROTEINS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY ON ATOMIC SOLVATION PARAMETERS [J].
VONFREYBERG, B ;
RICHMOND, TJ ;
BRAUN, W .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 233 (02) :275-292
[44]   PROTEIN TARGETS FOR STRUCTURE-BASED DRUG DESIGN [J].
WALKINSHAW, MD .
MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1992, 12 (04) :317-372
[45]   ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL MOLECULAR-SURFACES [J].
WEINER, PK ;
LANGRIDGE, R ;
BLANEY, JM ;
SCHAEFER, R ;
KOLLMAN, PA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 79 (12) :3754-3758
[46]   AN ALL ATOM FORCE-FIELD FOR SIMULATIONS OF PROTEINS AND NUCLEIC-ACIDS [J].
WEINER, SJ ;
KOLLMAN, PA ;
NGUYEN, DT ;
CASE, DA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1986, 7 (02) :230-252
[47]   PROTEIN STRUCTURE-BASED DRUG DESIGN [J].
WHITTLE, PJ ;
BLUNDELL, TL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 1994, 23 :349-375