The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task

被引:358
作者
Egner, T [1 ]
Hirsch, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, fMRI Res Ctr, Neurol Inst, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
conflict adaptation; cognitive control; stroop task; psychophysiological interaction;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
It is well known that performance on a given trial of a cognitive task is affected by the nature of previous trials. For example, conflict effects on interference tasks, such as the Stroop task, are reduced subsequent to high-conflict trials relative to low-conflict trials. This interaction effect between previous and current trial types is called "conflict adaptation" and thought to be due to processing adjustments in cognitive control. The current study aimed to identify the neural substrates of cognitive control during conflict adaptation by isolating neural correlates of reduced conflict from those of increased cognitive control. We expected cognitive control to be implemented by prefrontal cortex through context-specific modulation of posterior regions involved in sensory and motor aspects of task performance. We collected event-related fMRI data on a color-word naming Stroop task and found distinct fronto-parietal networks of current trial conflict detection and conflict adaptation through cognitive control. Conflict adaptation was associated with increased activity in left middle frontal gyrus (GFm) and superior frontal gyrus (GFs), consistent with increased cognitive control, and with decreased activity in bilateral prefrontal and parietal cortices, consistent with reduced response conflict. Psychophysiological interaction analysis (PPI) revealed that cognitive control activation in GFs and GFm was accompanied by increased functional integration with bilateral inferior frontal, right temporal and parietal areas, and the anterior cerebellum. These data suggest that cognitive control is implemented by medial and lateral prefrontal cortices that bias processes in regions that have been implicated in high-level perceptual and motor processes. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 547
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]   The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict [J].
Milham, MP ;
Banich, MT ;
Webb, A ;
Barad, V ;
Cohen, NJ ;
Wszalek, T ;
Kramer, AF .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (03) :467-473
[42]   Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control [J].
Milham, MP ;
Banich, MT ;
Claus, ED ;
Cohen, NJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 18 (02) :483-493
[43]   THE ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX MEDIATES PROCESSING SELECTION IN THE STROOP ATTENTIONAL CONFLICT PARADIGM [J].
PARDO, JV ;
PARDO, PJ ;
JANER, KW ;
RAICHLE, ME .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (01) :256-259
[44]   The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention - An event-related fMRI study [J].
Perry, RJ ;
Zeki, S .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :2273-2288
[45]   An fMRI study of Stroop word-color interference: Evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems [J].
Peterson, BS ;
Skudlarski, P ;
Gatenby, JC ;
Zhang, HP ;
Anderson, AW ;
Gore, JC .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 45 (10) :1237-1258
[46]  
Posner MI, 1998, ATTENTIVE BRAIN, P401
[47]   WHAT DOES A MAN DO AFTER HE MAKES AN ERROR - ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE PROGRAMMING [J].
RABBITT, P ;
RODGERS, B .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 29 (NOV) :727-743
[48]   ERRORS AND ERROR CORRECTION IN CHOICE-RESPONSE TASKS [J].
RABBITT, PMA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 71 (02) :264-&
[49]   Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions [J].
Stroop, JR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1935, 18 :643-662
[50]   Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location [J].
Stuss, DT ;
Floden, D ;
Alexander, MP ;
Levine, B ;
Katz, D .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2001, 39 (08) :771-786