The intravenous ketamine test: A predictive response tool for oral dextromethorphan treatment in neuropathic pain

被引:23
作者
Cohen, SP
Chang, AS
Larkin, T
Mao, JR
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Pain Management Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Pain Managment Ctr, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[3] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Clin Invest, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[4] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[5] Landstuhl Reg Army Med Ctr, Landstuhl, Germany
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000136953.11583.7B
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
TV infusion tests performed to predict subsequent response to oral analgesics are an increasingly popular method used to enhance medical care and conserve resources. Because no infusion test is completely accurate, the potential benefits of these tests Must be weighed against the frustration and waste in resources encountered with false-positive results, and the failure to use a potentially beneficial treatment with false-negative results. In recent years, drugs that act antagonistically at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors have been shown to be valuable adjuncts in the treatment of pain. To determine the predictive value of small-dose (0.1 mg/kg) IV ketamine on an oral dextromethorphan (DX) treatment regimen, we analyzed the analgesic response to these drugs in 25 patients at 2 tertiary care military treatment facilities, institutions at which DX is not readily accessible. When greater than or equal to50% response for both drugs was used as the outcome measure for success, the positive predictive value of the ketamine test was 64%, the negative predictive value 73%, and the observed agreement 68%. However, when greater than or equal to67% relief with ketamine was used as an outcome measure (as determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve), the positive predictive value was 90%, the negative predictive value 80%, and the observed agreement increased to 84%. Based on these results, we conclude that an IV ketamine test may be useful in predicting response to oral DX. More research is needed to determine the ideal candidates for such a test, and the optimal dose and cutoff value for the response to ketamine.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1759
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN J PAIN
[2]   THE COMBINATION OF NMDA ANTAGONISM AND MORPHINE PRODUCES PROFOUND ANTINOCICEPTION IN THE RAT DORSAL HORN [J].
CHAPMAN, V ;
DICKENSON, AH .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1992, 573 (02) :321-323
[3]   Improved postoperative pain control in pediatric adenotonsillectomy with dextromethorphan [J].
Dawson, GS ;
Seidman, P ;
Ramadan, HH .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (07) :1223-1226
[4]   DEXTROMETHORPHAN AND LEVORPHANOL ON DORSAL HORN NOCICEPTIVE NEURONS IN THE RAT [J].
DICKENSON, AH ;
SULLIVAN, AF ;
STANFA, LC ;
MCQUAY, HJ .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 30 (12A) :1303-1308
[5]   CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF THE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTIC ACID (NMDA) RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST KETAMINE IN THE TREATMENT OF POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA [J].
EIDE, PK ;
STUBHAUG, A ;
OYE, I ;
BREIVIK, H .
PAIN, 1995, 61 (02) :221-228
[6]   Clinical experience with oral ketamine [J].
Enarson, MC ;
Hays, H ;
Woodroffe, MA .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 17 (05) :384-386
[7]   Response to intravenous lidocaine infusion predicts subsequent response to oral mexiletine: A prospective study [J].
Galer, BS ;
Harle, J ;
Rowbotham, MC .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1996, 12 (03) :161-167
[8]   The effects of ketamine-isomers on neuronal injury and regeneration in rat hippocampal neurons [J].
Himmelseher, S ;
Pfenninger, E ;
Georgieff, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (03) :505-512
[9]   Ketamine: Teaching an old drug new tricks [J].
Kohrs, R ;
Durieux, ME .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (05) :1186-1193
[10]   Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: A critical review [J].
Ludbrook, J .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 29 (07) :527-536