General anaesthesia or conscious sedation for painful procedures in childhood cancer: the family's perspective

被引:42
作者
Crock, C
Olsson, C
Phillips, R
Chalkiadis, G
Sawyer, S
Ashley, D
Camilleri, S
Carlin, J
Monagle, P
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Haematol Lab, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Childrens Hosp, Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[4] Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Anaesthet, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[5] Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Hematol, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/adc.88.3.253
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Until recently, midazolam sedation was routinely used in our institution for bone marrow aspirates and lumbar punctures in children with cancer. It has been perceived by many doctors and nurses as being well tolerated by children and their families. Aim: To compare the efficacy of inhalational general anaesthesia and midazolam sedation for these procedures. Methods: A total of 96 children with neoplastic disorders, who received either inhalational general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen (GA) or sedation with oral or nasal midazolam (SED) as part of their routine preparation for procedures were studied. The experiences of these childen were examined during their current procedure and during their first ever procedure. Main outcome measures were the degree of physical restraint used on the child, and the levels of distress and pain experienced by the child during the current procedure and during the first procedure. The family's preference for future procedures. Results: During 102 procedures under GA, restraint was needed on four occasions (4%) when the anaesthetic mask was first applied, minimal pain was reported, and children were reported as distressed about 25% of the time. During 80 SED procedures, restraint was required in 94%, firm restraint was required in 66%, the child could not be restrained in 14%, median pain score was 6 (scale 0 (no pain) to 6 (maximum pain)), and 90% of the parents reported distress in their child. Ninety per cent of families wanted GA for future procedures. Many families reported dissatisfaction with the sedation regime and raised concerns about the restraint used on their child. Conclusions: This general anaesthetic regime minimised the need for restraint and was associated with low levels of pain and distress. The sedation regime, by contrast, was much less effective. There was a significant disparity between the perceptions of health professionals and those of families with respect to how children coped with painful procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 257
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   FREQUENT HYPOXEMIA AND APNEA AFTER SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL [J].
BAILEY, PL ;
PACE, NL ;
ASHBURN, MA ;
MOLL, JWB ;
EAST, KA ;
STANLEY, TH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (05) :826-830
[2]   Sedation practices for Australian and New Zealand paediatric oncology patients [J].
Barnes, C ;
Downie, P ;
Chalkiadis, G ;
Camilleri, S ;
Monagle, P ;
Waters, K .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2002, 38 (02) :170-172
[3]   THE FACES PAIN SCALE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERITY OF PAIN EXPERIENCED BY CHILDREN - DEVELOPMENT, INITIAL VALIDATION, AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION FOR RATIO SCALE PROPERTIES [J].
BIERI, D ;
REEVE, RA ;
CHAMPION, GD ;
ADDICOAT, L ;
ZIEGLER, JB .
PAIN, 1990, 41 (02) :139-150
[4]  
Collins P, 1999, Paediatr Nurs, V11, P14
[5]   COMPARISON OF ENFLURANE, HALOTHANE, AND ISOFLURANE FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES IN CHILDREN WITH MALIGNANCIES [J].
FISHER, DM ;
ROBINSON, S ;
BRETT, CM ;
PERIN, G ;
GREGORY, GA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1985, 63 (06) :647-650
[6]   Invasive procedures carried out in conscious children: contrast between North American and European paediatric oncology centres [J].
Hain, RDW ;
Campbell, C .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2001, 85 (01) :12-14
[7]   ANESTHESIA FOR MINOR PROCEDURES IN CHILDREN WITH MALIGNANT DISEASE [J].
HAIN, WR ;
TOMLINSON, JH ;
BARBOR, PRH .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1985, 78 (09) :715-720
[8]   Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children [J].
Hertzog, JH ;
Dalton, HJ ;
Anderson, BD ;
Shad, AT ;
Gootenberg, JE ;
Hauser, GJ .
PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (04) :742-747
[9]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY VERSUS GENERAL-ANESTHESIA FOR PAINFUL MEDICAL PROCEDURES IN CHILDREN [J].
JAY, S ;
ELLIOTT, CH ;
FITZGIBBONS, I ;
WOODY, P ;
SIEGEL, S .
PAIN, 1995, 62 (01) :3-9
[10]  
Jay S.M., 1983, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V2, P133, DOI [10.1037/0278-6133.2.2.133, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.2.2.133]