The impact of text coherence on learning by self-explanation

被引:70
作者
Ainsworth, Shaaron
Burcham, Sarah
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Learning Sci Res Inst, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
text comprehension; self-explanation; strategy;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.004
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that encouraging learners to explain material to themselves as they study can increase their understanding. Furthermore, different types of material (e.g. text or diagrams) influence learners' self-explanation behaviour. This study explores whether the coherence of text impacts upon the self-explanation effect. Forty-eight low-knowledge learners (university students) learnt about the circulatory system with text that was designed to be either maximally or minimally coherent. Half of these learners also received self-explanation training. Results showed that learners given maximally coherent text learnt more, as did learners who self-explained. However, this was not because coherent text increased self-explaining. Instead minimally coherent text significantly increased the number of self-explanations that learners made. It is suggested that self-explaining in the minimal text condition served to compensate for weaknesses and gaps in the text, whereas self-explaining in the maximal text condition may have led learners to detect flaws in their mental models and repair them. Consequently, rather than providing a minimally coherent text which compels low knowledge learners to self-explain to overcome its deficits, we should instead encourage learners to self-explain from well structured and explicit text. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 303
页数:18
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
Conati C., 2000, INT J ARTIFICIAL INT, V11, P389, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40593-015-0074-8
[12]   Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation [J].
Cote, N ;
Goldman, SR ;
Saul, EU .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1998, 25 (01) :1-53
[13]   Some good texts are always better:: Text revision to foster inferences of readers with high and low prior background knowledge [J].
Gilabert, R ;
Martínez, G ;
Vidal-Abarca, E .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2005, 15 (01) :45-68
[14]  
KINTSCH E, 1995, SWISS J PSYCHOL, V54, P141
[15]  
Lindblom-Ylänne S, 1999, LEARN INSTR, V9, P1
[16]  
LOXTERMAN JA, 1994, READ RES QUART, V29, P353
[17]   THE CONTRIBUTION OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND COHERENT TEXT TO COMPREHENSION [J].
MCKEOWN, MG ;
BECK, IL ;
SINATRA, GM ;
LOXTERMAN, JA .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1992, 27 (01) :78-93
[18]   Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text [J].
McNamara, DS ;
Kintsch, E ;
Songer, NB ;
Kintsch, W .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1996, 14 (01) :1-43
[19]   iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking [J].
McNamara, DS ;
Levinstein, IB ;
Boonthum, C .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2004, 36 (02) :222-233
[20]   SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training [J].
McNamara, DS .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2004, 38 (01) :1-30