NIMBY and the hazardous and toxic waste siting dilemma: The need for concept clarification

被引:33
作者
Luloff, AE
Albrecht, SL
Bourke, L
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Sociol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth Policy & Epidemiol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Sydney, Dept Social Work Social Policy & Sociol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
concept clarification; hazardous waste; not in my backyard (NIMBY); siting;
D O I
10.1080/08941929809381063
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Finding ways to appropriately dispose of the various wastes that we generate has become one of our most urgent and difficult public policy problems. Researchers and policymakers alike have increasingly attributed much of the blame for policy siting failures to local not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) responses. However, this concept, as currently used in the literature, has limited utility because of the absence of conceptual and operational clarity. We discuss major problems with the concept, including indiscriminate use, incentives problems, equity issues, and the assumed irrational base of NIMBYism. important research issues are identified that must be addressed if the concept is to retain scientific and policymaking utility.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 89
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   THE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE FRAME - A CONCEPTUAL DISCUSSION AND AN APPLICATION [J].
CAPEK, SM .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1993, 40 (01) :5-24
[12]   THE MESCALERO OPTION [J].
CARTER, LJ .
BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 1994, 50 (05) :11-13
[13]  
Cerrell Associates Incorporated, 1984, POL DIFF FAC WAST TO
[14]  
Coleman James, 1957, COMMUNITY C
[15]  
COOK E, 1982, SOC SCI QUART, V63, P3
[16]  
DOWNS A, 1972, PUBLIC INTEREST, P38
[18]  
ENGLISH M, 1992, SITING LOW LEVEL RAD
[19]   POLICY GRIDLOCK IN WASTE MANAGEMENT - BALANCING FEDERAL AND STATE CONCERNS [J].
FELDMAN, DL ;
PERETZ, JH ;
JENDRUCKO, BD .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1994, 22 (04) :589-603
[20]  
FLYNN J, 1992, ISSUES SCI TECHNOL, V8, P42