Reproducibility of 18F-FDG microPET studies in mouse tumor xenografts

被引:85
作者
Dandekar, Mangal
Tseng, Jeffrey R.
Gambhir, Sanjiv S.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, BioX Program, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
F-18-FDG; small-animal PET; reproducibility; tumor xenograft; drug development;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.106.036608
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
F-18-FDG has been used to image mouse xenograft models with small-animal PET for therapy response. However, the reproducibility of serial scans has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to determine the reproducibility of 18F-FDG small-animal PET studies. Methods: Mouse tumor xenografts were formed with B16F10 murine melanoma cells. A 7-min small-animal PET scan was performed 1 h after a 3.7- to 7.4-MBq F-18-FDG injection via the tail vein. A second small-animal PET scan was performed 6 h later after reinjection of 18F-FDG. Twenty-five sets of studies were performed. Mean injected dose per gram (%ID/g) values were calculated from tumor regions of interest. The coefficient of variation (COV) from studies performed on the same day was calculated to determine the reproducibility. Activity from the second scans performed after 6 h were adjusted by subtracting the estimated residual activity from the first 18F-FDG injection. For 7 datasets, an additional scan immediately before the second injection was performed, and residual activity from this additional delayed scan was subtracted from the activity of the second injection. COVs of both subtraction methods were compared. Blood glucose values were measured at the time of injection and used to correct the %ID/g values. Results: The COV for the mean %ID/g between F-18- FDG small-animal PET scans performed on the same day 6 h apart was 15.4% - 12.6%. The delayed scan subtraction method did not produce any significant change in the COV. Blood glucose correction increased the COV. The injected dose, tumor size, and body weight did not appear to contribute to the variability of the scans. Conclusion: 18F-FDG small-animal PET mouse xenograft studies were reproducible with moderately low variability. Therefore, serial small-animal PET studies may be performed with reasonable accuracy to measure tumor response to therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 607
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Nevill, AM .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) :217-238
[2]  
Balcombe JP, 2004, CONTEMP TOP LAB ANIM, V43, P42
[3]  
Fueger BJ, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P999
[4]  
Gambhir SS, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, p1S
[5]   ACCELERATED IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION USING ORDERED SUBSETS OF PROJECTION DATA [J].
HUDSON, HM ;
LARKIN, RS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1994, 13 (04) :601-609
[6]   The progress and promise of molecular imaging probes in oncologic drug development [J].
Kelloff, GJ ;
Krohn, KA ;
Larson, SM ;
Weissleder, R ;
Mankoff, DA ;
Hoffman, JM ;
Link, JM ;
Guyton, KZ ;
Eckelman, WC ;
Scher, HI ;
O'Shaughnessy, J ;
Cheson, BD ;
Sigman, CC ;
Tatum, JL ;
Mills, GQ ;
Sullivan, DC ;
Woodcock, J .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (22) :7967-7985
[7]   Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents [J].
Knoess, C ;
Siegel, S ;
Smith, A ;
Newport, D ;
Richerzhagen, R ;
Winkeler, A ;
Jacobs, A ;
Goble, RN ;
Graf, R ;
Wienhard, K ;
Heiss, WD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (05) :737-747
[8]   How should we analyse FDG PET studies for monitoring tumour response? [J].
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Giaccone, Giuseppe ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 (Suppl 1) :S16-S21
[9]  
Lee KH, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P1531
[10]   AMIDE: A Free Software Tool for Multimodality Medical Image Analysis [J].
Loening, Andreas Markus ;
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam .
Molecular Imaging, 2003, 2 (03) :131-137