Site-directed mutagenesis of CCR2 identified amino acid residues in transmembrane helices 1, 2, and 7 important for MCP-1 binding and biological functions

被引:18
作者
Gavrilin, MA [1 ]
Gulina, IV
Kawano, T
Dragan, S
Chakravarti, L
Kolattukudy, PE
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Davis Heart & Lung Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Mol Biol & Microbiol, Biomol Sci Ctr, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Neurobiotechnol Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
monocytes/macrophages; chemokines; chemotaxis; signal transduction;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.037
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) binds its G-protein-coupled seven transmembrane (TM) receptor. CCR2B, and causes infiltration of monocytes/macrophages into areas of injury, infection or inflammation. To identify functionally important amino acid residues in CCR2B, we made specific mutations of nine residues selected on the basis of conservation in chemokine receptors and located TM1 (Tyr(49)) TM2 (Leu(95)) TM3 (Thr(117) and Tyr(120)), and TM7 (Ala(286), Thr(290), Glu(291), and His(297)) and in the extracellular loop 3 (Glu(278)). MCP-1 binding was drastically affected only by mutations in TM7. Reversing the charge at Glu(291) (E291K) and a; His(297) (H297D) prevented MCP binding although substitution with Ala at either site had little effect, suggesting that Glu(291) and His(297) probably stabilize TM7 by their ionic interaction. E291A elicited normal Ca2+ influx. H297A. YA9F in TM1 and L95A in TM2 that showed normal MCP-1 binding did not elicit Ca2+ influx and elicited no adenylate cyclase inhibition at any MCP-1 concentration. MCP-1 treatment of HEK293 cells caused lamellipodia formation only when they expressed CCR2B. The mutants that showed no Ca2+ influx and adenylate cyclase inhibition by MCP-1 treatment showed lamellipodia formation and chemotaxis. Our results show that induction of lamellipodia formation. but not Ca2+ influx and adenylate cyclase inhibition, is necessary for chemotaxis. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 540
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 upregulates IL-1β expression in human monocytes [J].
Gavrilin, MA ;
Deucher, MF ;
Boeckman, F ;
Kolattukudy, PE .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 277 (01) :37-42
[12]   The many faces of G protein signaling [J].
Hamm, HE .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 273 (02) :669-672
[13]   Role of the first extracellular loop in the functional activation of CCR2 - The first extracellular loop contains distinct domains necessary for both agonist binding and transmembrane signaling [J].
Han, KH ;
Green, SR ;
Tangirala, RK ;
Tanaka, S ;
Quehenberger, O .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 274 (45) :32055-32062
[14]   Identification of residues in the monocyte chemotactic protein-1 that contact the MCP-1 receptor, CCR2 [J].
Hemmerich, S ;
Paavola, C ;
Bloom, A ;
Bhakta, S ;
Freedman, R ;
Grunberger, D ;
Krstenansky, J ;
Lee, S ;
McCarley, D ;
Mulkins, M ;
Wong, B ;
Pease, J ;
Mizoue, L ;
Mirzadegan, T ;
Polsky, I ;
Thompson, K ;
Handel, TM ;
Jarnagin, K .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 38 (40) :13013-13025
[15]   A GENERAL-METHOD OF INVITRO PREPARATION AND SPECIFIC MUTAGENESIS OF DNA FRAGMENTS - STUDY OF PROTEIN AND DNA INTERACTIONS [J].
HIGUCHI, R ;
KRUMMEL, B ;
SAIKI, RK .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1988, 16 (15) :7351-7367
[16]   Chemokine receptors [J].
Horuk, R .
CYTOKINE & GROWTH FACTOR REVIEWS, 2001, 12 (04) :313-335
[17]  
HUNG DT, 1992, J BIOL CHEM, V267, P20831
[18]   Identification of surface residues of the monocyte chemotactic protein 1 that affect signaling through the receptor CCR2 [J].
Jarnagin, K ;
Grunberger, D ;
Mulkins, M ;
Wong, B ;
Hemmerich, S ;
Paavola, C ;
Bloom, A ;
Bhakta, S ;
Diehl, F ;
Freedman, R ;
McCarley, D ;
Polsky, I ;
Ping-Tsou, A ;
Kosaka, A ;
Handel, TM .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 38 (49) :16167-16177
[19]  
LOCATI M, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P4746
[20]   Chemokines as regulators of T cell differentiation [J].
Luther, SA ;
Cyster, JG .
NATURE IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 2 (02) :102-107