Meta-analysis: Angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure and high-risk acute myocardial infarction

被引:138
作者
Lee, VC [1 ]
Rhew, DC [1 ]
Dylan, M [1 ]
Badamgarav, E [1 ]
Braunstein, GD [1 ]
Weingarten, SR [1 ]
机构
[1] Zynx Hlth Inc, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The role of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in treating patients with chronic heart failure and high-risk acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been controversial, and recent clinical trials provide more information on this topic. Purpose: To quantify the effect of ARBs when compared with placebo (with and without background angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors) and ACE inhibitors on all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure and high-risk acute MI. Data Sources: Data from original research published through 13 November 2003. Study Selection: Predefined criteria were used to identify 24 trials. Data Extraction: 2 reviewers independently collected information on study characteristics and data on all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Data Synthesis: 24 trials involving 38 080 patients were included. Analysis of chronic heart failure trials revealed that 1) ARBs were associated with reduced all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00]) and heart failure hospitalizations (OR, 0.64 [CI, 0.53 to 0.781) as compared with placebo; 2) for ARBs versus ACE inhibitors, all-cause mortality (OR, 1.06 [CI, 0.90 to 1.26]) and heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.95 [CI, 0.80 to 1.13]) did not differ; 3) and for combinations of ARBs plus ACE inhibitors versus ACE inhibitors alone, all-cause mortality was not reduced (OR, 0.97 [CI, 0.87 to 1.08]) but heart failure hospitalizations were reduced (OR, 0.77 [CI, 0.69 to 0.87]). For patients with high-risk acute MI, 2 randomized trials compared ARBs with ACE inhibitors but did not reveal differences in all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Limitations: Comparative economic data between ARBs and ACE inhibitors are lacking. Conclusions: Because ACE inhibitors and ARBs do not differ in efficacy for reducing all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure and in patients with high-risk acute MI, ARBs should be regarded as suitable alternatives to ACE inhibitors.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 704
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Adams KF, 1999, J CARD FAIL, V5, P357
[2]   A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
ANTMAN, EM ;
LAU, J ;
KUPELNICK, B ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
CHALMERS, TC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (02) :240-248
[3]   Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updating [J].
Nicholas J Barrowman ;
Manchun Fang ;
Margaret Sampson ;
David Moher .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3 (1)
[4]   Augmented short- and long-term hemodynamic and hormonal effects of an angiotensin receptor blocker added to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure [J].
Baruch, L ;
Anand, I ;
Cohen, IS ;
Ziesche, S ;
Judd, D ;
Cohn, JN .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (20) :2658-2664
[5]   A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure [J].
Cohn, JN ;
Tognoni, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (23) :1667-1675
[6]   LOSARTAN IN HEART-FAILURE - HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS AND TOLERABILITY [J].
CROZIER, I ;
IKRAM, H ;
AWAN, N ;
CLELAND, J ;
STEPHEN, N ;
DICKSTEIN, K ;
FREY, M ;
YOUNG, J ;
KLINGER, G ;
MAKRIS, L ;
RUCINSKA, E .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (03) :691-697
[7]  
*CTR MED MED SERV, 2004, HOSP QUAL IN OV
[8]   The cost-effectiveness of losartan versus captopril in patients with symptomatic heart failure [J].
Dasbach, EJ ;
Rich, MW ;
Segal, R ;
Gerth, WC ;
Carides, GW ;
Cook, JR ;
Murray, JF ;
Snavely, DB ;
Pitt, B .
CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) :189-194
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF LOSARTAN AND ENALAPRIL ON CLINICAL STATUS AND EXERCISE PERFORMANCE IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE OR SEVERE CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE [J].
DICKSTEIN, K ;
CHANG, P ;
WILLENHEIMER, R ;
HAUNSO, S ;
REMES, J ;
HALL, C ;
KJEKSHUS, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 26 (02) :438-445