Effect of processing plant on pork quality

被引:32
作者
Hambrecht, E
Eissen, JJ
Verstegen, MWA
机构
[1] Nutreco Swine Res Ctr, NL-5830 AE Boxmeer, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Zodiac, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
pork quality; pre-slaughter stress; stunning; chilling;
D O I
10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00166-3
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The impact of processing plant on pork quality was studied by assessing pork quality in three commercial plants (A, B, Q. Plants differed in the layout of the races, stunning systems (A and B: electrical, C: CO2 stunning) and chilling systems (A: rapid chilling, B and C: conventional). Factors not related to the processing plants (e.g. genetic background of animals, transport, lairage) were standardized. In total, nine batches of about 150 pigs each were processed. Each batch was purchased at a commercial farm and randomly divided into three groups for delivery to the three processing plants. Meat quality was evaluated by measuring early postmortem muscle pH and temperature as well as ultimate pH, meat colour (Minolta Chroma Meter and Japanese colour scale), filter paper score (FPS), electrical conductivity (EC) and drip loss. Plant C produced an inferior quality compared to plants A and 13: meat was paler (C: 2.8 vs. A: 2.9 and B: 3.0 on the Japanese colour scale) and had higher drip losses (C: 5.2 vs. A: 4.8 and 13: 4.9%). Meat colour hardly differed between plants A and B but waterholding properties were best at plant A as indicated by FPS (A: 2.4 vs. 13: 2.8 vs. C: 3.3) and EC (A: 5.4 vs. B: 6.4 vs. C: 7.4 mS). It is concluded that processing plant may influence meat quality. Correlations between early post-mortem measurements and meat quality traits were low. Nevertheless, high carcass temperatures and low pH values early post-mortem were shown to lead to inferior meat quality. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 131
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BRISKEY ERNEST J., 1964, ADVANCE FOOD RES, V13, P89
[2]   Meat quality in pigs subjected to minimal preslaughter stress [J].
Brown, SN ;
Warriss, PD ;
Nute, GR ;
Edwards, JE ;
Knowles, TG .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1998, 49 (03) :257-265
[3]   Halothane genotype, pre-slaughter handling and stunning method all influence pork quality [J].
Channon, HA ;
Payne, AM ;
Warner, RD .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2000, 56 (03) :291-299
[4]  
Coma J., 2001, Pig News and Information, V22, p87N
[5]   EFFECTS OF FEED WITHDRAWAL BEFORE DELIVERY ON PORK QUALITY AND CARCASS YIELD [J].
EIKELENBOOM, G ;
BOLINK, AH ;
SYBESMA, W .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1991, 29 (01) :25-30
[6]   Effects of simulated lairage conditions on the physiology and behaviour of pigs [J].
Geverink, NA ;
Bradshaw, RH ;
Lambooij, E ;
Wiegant, VR ;
Broom, DM .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1998, 143 (09) :241-244
[7]   ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF PIG CHILLING [J].
GIGIEL, A ;
BUTLER, F ;
HUDSON, B .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1989, 26 (01) :67-83
[8]   A survey of pre-slaughter conditions, halothane gene frequency, and carcass and meat quality in five Spanish pig commercial abattoirs [J].
Gispert, M ;
Faucitano, L ;
Oliver, MA ;
Guàrdia, MD ;
Coll, C ;
Siggens, K ;
Harvey, K ;
Diestre, A .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2000, 55 (01) :97-106
[9]  
Grandin T, 1996, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V209, P757
[10]  
Henckel P., 1998, P INT C MEAT SCI TEC, P1068