Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures

被引:114
作者
Calus, M. P. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Anim Sci Grp, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
关键词
genomic selection; SNP; methods; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS; ASSISTED PREDICTION; TECHNICAL NOTE; GENETIC VALUE; SELECTION; ACCURACY; INFORMATION; MARKERS; HAPLOTYPE;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731109991352
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Animal breeding faces one of the most significant changes of the past decades - the implementation of genomic selection. Genomic selection uses dense marker maps to predict the breeding value of animals with reported accuracies that are up to 0.31 higher than those of pedigree indexes, without the need to phenotype the animals themselves, or close relatives thereof The basic principle is that because of the high marker density, each quantitative trait loci (QTL) is in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with at least one nearby marker The process involves putting a reference population together of animals with known phenotypes and genotypes to estimate the marker effects. Marker effects have been estimated with several different methods that generally aim at reducing the dimensions of the marker data. Nearly all reported models only included additive effects. Once the marker effects are estimated, breeding values of young selection candidates can be predicted with reported accuracies up to 0.85. Although results from simulation studies suggest that different models may yield more accurate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for different traits, depending on the underlying QTL distribution of the trait there is so far only little evidence from studies based on real data to support this. The accuracy of genomic predictions strongly depends on characteristics of the reference populations, such as number of animals, number of markers, and the heritability of the recorded phenotype. Another important factor is the relationship between animals in the reference population and the evaluated animals. The breakup of LD between markers and QTL across generations advocates frequent re-estimation of marker effects to maintain the accuracy of GEBVs at an acceptable level. Therefore, at low frequencies of re-estimating marker effects, it becomes more important that the model that estimates the marker effects capitalizes on LD information that is persistent across generations.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 164
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]  
Hayes B, 2001, GENET SEL EVOL, V33, P209, DOI 10.1051/gse:2001117
[22]   Technical note: Prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices [J].
Hayes, B. J. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (09) :2089-2092
[23]   Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges [J].
Hayes, B. J. ;
Bowman, P. J. ;
Chamberlain, A. J. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (02) :433-443
[24]   RAPID METHOD FOR COMPUTING INVERSE OF A RELATIONSHIP MATRIX [J].
HENDERSON, CR .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1975, 58 (11) :1727-1730
[25]   Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits [J].
Hill, William G. ;
Goddard, Michael E. ;
Visscher, Peter M. .
PLOS GENETICS, 2008, 4 (02)
[26]  
JANSEN RC, 1993, GENETICS, V135, P205
[27]  
JANSS L, 2008, 59 ANN M EAAP VILN L
[28]   Efficient selective screening of haplotype tag SNPs [J].
Ke, XY ;
Cardon, LR .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (02) :287-288
[29]   Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel [J].
Khatkar, Mehar S. ;
Nicholas, Frank W. ;
Collins, Andrew R. ;
Zenger, Kyall R. ;
Al Cavanagh, Julie ;
Barris, Wes ;
Schnabel, Robert D. ;
Taylor, Jeremy F. ;
Raadsma, Herman W. .
BMC GENOMICS, 2008, 9 (1)
[30]   Technical note:: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection [J].
Legarra, A. ;
Misztal, I. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2008, 91 (01) :360-366