Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk

被引:209
作者
Kerlikowske, Karla
Ichikawa, Laura
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Buist, Diana S. M.
Vacek, Pamela M.
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
Yankaskas, Bonnie
Carney, Patricia A.
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs, Gen Internal Med Sect, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Grp Hlth Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Med Biostat, Burlington, VT USA
[7] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[8] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[9] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[10] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[11] NCI, Appl Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djk066
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background Whether a change over time in clinically measured mammographic breast density influences breast cancer risk is unknown. Methods From January 1993 to December 2003, data that included American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density categories (1-4 in order of increasing density) were collected prospectively on 301955 women aged 30 and older who were not using postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and underwent at least two screening mammography examinations; 2639 of the women were diagnosed with breast cancer within 1 year of the last examination. Women's first and last BI-RADS breast density (average 3.2 years apart) and logistic regression were used to model the odds of having invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed within 12 months of the last examination by change in BI-RADS category. Rates of breast cancer adjusted for age, mammography registry, and time between screening examinations were estimated from this model. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The rate (breast cancers per 1000 women) of breast cancer was higher if BI-RADS breast density category increased from 1 to 2 (5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7 to 6.9) or 1 to 3 (9.9, 95% Cl = 6.4 to 15.5) compared to when it remained at BI-RADS density of 1 (3.0, 95% Cl = 2.3 to 3.9; P <.001 for trend). Similar and statistically significant trends between increased or decreased density and increased or decreased risk of breast cancer, respectively, were observed for women whose breast density category was initially 2 or 3 and changed categories. BI-RADS density of 4 on the first examination was associated with a high rate of breast cancer (range 9.1-13.4) that remained high even if breast density decreased. Conclusion An increase in BI-RADS breast density category within 3 years may be associated with an increase in breast cancer risk and a decrease in density category with a decrease in risk compared to breast cancer risk in women in whom breast density category remains unchanged. Two longitudinal measures of BI-RADS breast density may better predict a woman's risk of breast cancer than a single measure.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2003, Breast imaging reporting and data system
[2]
Prescription of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention by primary care physicians [J].
Armstrong, Katrina ;
Quistberg, D. Alex ;
Micco, Ellyn ;
Domchek, Susan ;
Guerra, Carmen .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (20) :2260-2265
[3]
Atkinson C, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P863
[4]
Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[5]
Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography [J].
Barlow, William E. ;
White, Emily ;
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel ;
Vacek, Pamela M. ;
Titus-Ernstoff, Linda ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Rosenberg, Robert ;
Yankaskas, Bonnie C. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1204-1214
[6]
Boyd N, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P1048
[7]
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[8]
Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Rommens, JM ;
Vogt, K ;
Lee, V ;
Hopper, JL ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Paterson, AD .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (10) :798-808
[9]
Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Jensen, HM ;
Cooke, G ;
Han, HL ;
Lockwood, GA ;
Miller, AB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2000, 9 (01) :15-24
[10]
Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Dite, GS ;
Stone, J ;
Gunasekara, A ;
English, DR ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Giles, GG ;
Tritchler, D ;
Chiarelli, A ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Hopper, JL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (12) :886-894