Variability of Semiautomated Lung Nodule Volumetry on Ultralow-Dose CT: Comparison with Nodule Volumetry on Standard-Dose CT

被引:38
作者
Hein, Patrick A. [1 ]
Romano, Valentina C. [1 ]
Rogalla, Patrik [1 ]
Klessen, Christian [1 ]
Lembcke, Alexander [1 ]
Bornemann, Lars [2 ]
Dicken, Volker [2 ]
Hamm, Bernd [1 ]
Bauknecht, Hans-Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Radiol, Charite Campus Mitte, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] MeVis Res Ctr Med Image Comp, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
关键词
Chest CT; lung neoplasms; segmentation; computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); radiation dose; SMALL PULMONARY NODULES; INTEROBSERVER-VARIABILITY; RECONSTRUCTION PARAMETERS; AUTOMATED VOLUMETRY; TUMOR RESPONSE; THORACIC CT; SPIRAL CT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEGMENTATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-008-9157-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The study investigates the effect of a substantial dose reduction on the variability of lung nodule volume measurements by assessing and comparing nodule volumes using a dedicated semiautomated segmentation software on ultralow-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) and standard-dose computed tomography (SD-CT) data. In 20 patients, thin-slice chest CT datasets (1 mm slice thickness; 20% reconstruction overlap) were acquired at ultralow-dose (120 kV, 5 mAs) and at standard-dose (120 kV, 75 mAs), respectively, and analyzed using the segmentation software OncoTREAT (MeVis, Bremen, Germany; version 1.3). Interobserver variability of volume measurements of 202 solid pulmonary nodules (mean diameter 11 mm, range 3.2-44.5 mm) was calculated for SD-CT and ULD-CT. With respect to interobserver variability, the 95% confidence interval for the relative differences in nodule volume in the intrascan analysis was measured with -9.7% to 8.3% (mean difference -0.7%) for SD-CT and with -12.6% to 12.4% (mean difference -0.2%) for ULD-CT. In the interscan analysis, the 95% confidence intervals for the differences in nodule volume ranged with -25.1% to -23.4% and 26.2% to 28.9% (mean difference 1.4% to 2.1%) dependent on the combination of readers and scans. Intrascan interobserver variability of volume measurements was comparable for ULD-CT and SD-CT data. The calculated variability of volume measurements in the interscan analysis was similar to the data reported in the literature for CT data acquired with equal radiation dose. Thus, the evaluated segmentation software provides nodule volumetry that appears to be independent of the dose level with which the CT source dataset is acquired.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 17
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Volumetric assessment of pulmonary nodules with ECG-gated MDCT [J].
Boll, DT ;
Gilkeson, RC ;
Fleiter, TR ;
Blackham, KA ;
Duerk, JL ;
Lewin, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (05) :1217-1223
[2]   Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels [J].
Bolte, H. ;
Jahnke, T. ;
Schaefer, F. K. W. ;
Wenke, R. ;
Hoffmann, B. ;
Freitag-Wolf, S. ;
Dicken, V. ;
Kuhnigk, J. M. ;
Lohmann, J. ;
Voss, S. ;
Knoess, N. ;
Heller, M. ;
Biederer, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 64 (02) :285-295
[3]   Computed tomography-based lung nodule volumetry -: Do optimized reconstructions of routine protocols achieve similar accuracy, reproducibility and interobserver variability to that of special volumetry protocols? [J].
Bolte, H. ;
Riedel, C. ;
Knoess, N. ;
Freitag, S. ;
Hoffmann, B. ;
Heller, M. ;
Biederer, J. .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2007, 179 (03) :276-281
[4]   Informatics in radiology (infoRAD) -: New tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT -: Part 2.: Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases [J].
Bornemann, L ;
Kuhnigk, JM ;
Dicken, V ;
Zidowitz, S ;
Kuemmerlen, B ;
Krass, S ;
Peitgen, HO ;
Wein, BB ;
Schubert, H ;
Shin, HO ;
Wormanns, D .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (03) :841-848
[5]   Automated volumetry of solid pulmonary nodules in a phantom -: Accuracy across different CT scanner technologies [J].
Das, Marco ;
Muehlenbruch, Georg ;
Katoh, Markus ;
Bakai, Annemarie ;
Salganicoff, Marcos ;
Stanzel, Sven ;
Mahnken, Andreas H. ;
Guenther, Rolf W. ;
Wildberger, Joachim E. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (05) :297-302
[6]   Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers [J].
Diederich, S ;
Wormanns, D ;
Semik, M ;
Thomas, M ;
Lenzen, H ;
Roos, N ;
Heindel, W .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (03) :773-781
[7]   Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response [J].
Erasmus, JJ ;
Gladish, GW ;
Broemeling, L ;
Sabloff, BS ;
Truong, MT ;
Herbst, RS ;
Munden, RF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) :2574-2582
[8]   Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: Interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements [J].
Gietema, Hester A. ;
Wang, Ying ;
Xu, Dongming ;
van Klaveren, Rob J. ;
deKoning, Harry ;
Scholten, Ernst ;
Verschakelen, Johny ;
Kohl, Gerhard ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
Prokop, Mathias .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (01) :251-257
[9]   Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: Effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy [J].
Goo, JM ;
Tongdee, T ;
Tongdee, R ;
Yeo, K ;
Hildebolt, CF ;
Bae, KT .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (03) :850-856
[10]   Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements [J].
Goodman, LR ;
Gulsun, M ;
Washington, L ;
Nagy, PG ;
Piacsek, KL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (04) :989-994