Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive cocci in blood cultures by direct inoculation into the BD Phoenix system

被引:44
作者
Lupetti, A. [1 ]
Barnini, S. [1 ]
Castagna, B. [1 ]
Nibbering, P. H. [2 ]
Campa, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Patol Sperimentale Biotecnol Med Inf, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Infect Dis, Ctr Infect Dis, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Bactec; 9240; blood culture; direct identification and susceptibility testing; Gram-positive cocci; Phoenix system; Vitek; 2; NEGATIVE BACILLI; BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION; MICROSCAN OVERNIGHT; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03006.x
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
P>Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the causative agent(s) of bloodstream infections are essential for the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. To speed up the identification and AST of the causative agent, the fluid from blood culture bottles of a Bactec 9240 instrument (Becton Dickinson) containing Gram-positive cocci was mixed with saponin. After a 15-min incubation, the bacteria were harvested and transferred to the appropriate panel of a BD Phoenix automated microbiology system (Becton Dickinson) for identification and AST. With this approach (referred to as the direct method), we concordantly/correctly identified 56 (82%) of 68 monomicrobial cultures using the results obtained with the method currently used in our laboratory (current method) as comparator. Two (3%) isolates could not be identified and ten (15%) were misidentified. Complete agreement, concerning clinical susceptibility categories and MIC values, between the AST results determined with the direct method and the current method was found for 32 (55%) of 58 isolates. The E-test indicated that the direct method yielded a correct susceptibility profile for 13 of the remaining 26 blood culture isolates. Therefore, a concordant/correct susceptibility profile (with all antimicrobial agents tested) was obtained for 45 (77%) of 58 cultures. The overall error rate amounted to 1.9%, with the majority (1.3%) of errors being minor. Importantly, the results obtained with the direct method were available 12-24 h earlier than those obtained with the current method.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 991
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLASS 2 SPEC CONTR G
[2]   Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing [J].
Barenfanger, J ;
Drake, C ;
Kacich, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (05) :1415-1418
[3]   Identification of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci by Using the BD Phoenix System in the Low-Inoculum Mode [J].
Brigante, Gioconda ;
Menozzi, Maria Grazia ;
Pini, Beatrice ;
Porta, Rosaria ;
Somenzi, Pietro ;
Sciacca, Agata ;
Spanu, Teresa ;
Stefani, Stefania .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (11) :3826-3828
[4]   Identification and susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by direct inoculation from positive BACTEC blood culture bottles into Vitek 2 [J].
Bruins, MJ ;
Bloembergen, P ;
Ruijs, GJHM ;
Wolfhagen, MJHM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (01) :7-11
[5]  
Chen JR, 2008, J MICROBIOL IMMUNOL, V41, P259
[6]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2007, M100S17 CLSI
[7]  
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2006, M7A7 CLSI
[8]   Use of positive blood cultures for direct identification and susceptibility testing with the Vitek 2 system [J].
de Cueto, M ;
Ceballos, E ;
Martinez-Martinez, L ;
Perea, EJ ;
Pascual, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (08) :3734-3738
[9]   CLINICAL IMPACT OF RAPID IN-VITRO SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING AND BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION [J].
DOERN, GV ;
VAUTOUR, R ;
GAUDET, M ;
LEVY, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (07) :1757-1762
[10]   Evaluation of wider system for direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood culture bottles [J].
Fontanals, D ;
Salceda, F ;
Hernández, J ;
Sanfeliu, I ;
Torra, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 21 (09) :693-695