Planning for conservation and restoration under climate and land use change in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

被引:81
作者
Zwiener, Victor P. [1 ,2 ]
Padial, Andre A. [2 ]
Marques, Marcia C. M. [2 ]
Faleiro, Frederico V. [3 ]
Loyola, Rafael [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Peterson, A. Townsend [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Biodiversidade, Setor Palotina, Palotina, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Lab Ecol Vegetal, Dept Bot, Setor Ciencias Biol, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Goias, Lab Biogeog Conservacao, Dept Ecol, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[4] Inst Pesquisas Jardim Bot Rio de Janeiro, Ctr Nacl Conservacao Flora, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais, Brazilian Res Network Climate Change Rede Clima, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Kansas, Biodivers Inst, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
Aichi targets; climate change; ecological restoration; land use change; MaxEnt; spatial conservation prioritization; species distribution modelling; Zonation; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY; FUTURE; IMPACTS; AREA; UNCERTAINTIES; DISTRIBUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; EXTINCTION;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12588
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
AimTo propose and compare priority sites for conservation and restoration of woody plants under diverse climate and land use scenarios, considering socio-economic costs, presence of protected areas and distribution of forest remnants. LocationThe Atlantic Forest Biodiversity Hotspot, Brazil. MethodsWe used ecological niche modelling to estimate geographical distributions for 2,255 species under current and future climate scenarios, which we analysed in relation to spatially explicit land use projections, maps of forest remnants derived from remote sensing and socio-economic variables for each municipality within the Atlantic Forest region. We identified spatial priorities that complement the current network of protected areas under three different prioritization scenarios: (1) conservation of existing forest remnants only; (2) conservation of remnants followed by restoration of degraded habitat; and (3) unconstrained actions, in which management location is not defined a priori. We compared our results under different levels of land protection, with targets of 10%, 17% and 20% of the Atlantic Forest extent. ResultsCurrent forest remnants cover only 12% of the Atlantic Forest, so targets of 17% and 20% were achieved only through active restoration. Targets of 17% and 20% captured most species and represented on average 26%-34% of species' distributions. The spatial pattern of degraded habitats negatively affected representation of biodiversity and implied higher costs and reduced efficiency of planning. We did not observe major differences between conservation prioritizations based on contrasting climate change scenarios. Main conclusionsProtection of forest remnants alone will not suffice to safeguard woody plant species under climate and land use changes; therefore, restoration actions are urgently needed in the Atlantic Forest. With integrated management actions and multicriterion nationwide planning, reaching the 17% of land protection of Aichi biodiversity targets will constitute an important step towards protecting Atlantic Forest biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 966
页数:12
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Report of the tenth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity, DOI DOI 10.1111/COBI.12383
[3]   Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Townsend Peterson, A. .
ECOLOGY, 2012, 93 (07) :1527-1539
[4]   Climate change threatens European conservation areas [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Alagador, Diogo ;
Cabeza, Mar ;
Nogues-Bravo, David ;
Thuiller, Wilfried .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 14 (05) :484-492
[5]   Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the future of humid tropical forests [J].
Asner, Gregory P. ;
Loarie, Scott R. ;
Heyder, Ursula .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (06) :395-403
[6]   Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot [J].
Banks-Leite, Cristina ;
Pardini, Renata ;
Tambosi, Leandro R. ;
Pearse, William D. ;
Bueno, Adriana A. ;
Bruscagin, Roberta T. ;
Condez, Thais H. ;
Dixo, Marianna ;
Igari, Alexandre T. ;
Martensen, Alexandre C. ;
Metzger, Jean Paul .
SCIENCE, 2014, 345 (6200) :1041-1045
[7]   The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling [J].
Barve, Narayani ;
Barve, Vijay ;
Jimenez-Valverde, Alberto ;
Lira-Noriega, Andres ;
Maher, Sean P. ;
Peterson, A. Townsend ;
Soberon, Jorge ;
Villalobos, Fabricio .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (11) :1810-1819
[8]   Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity [J].
Bellard, Celine ;
Bertelsmeier, Cleo ;
Leadley, Paul ;
Thuiller, Wilfried ;
Courchamp, Franck .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 15 (04) :365-377
[9]   Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models [J].
Boria, Robert A. ;
Olson, Link E. ;
Goodman, Steven M. ;
Anderson, Robert P. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2014, 275 :73-77
[10]   A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives [J].
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. ;
Garcia, Letcia C. ;
Loyola, Rafael ;
Rodrigues, Ricardo R. ;
Pillar, Valerio D. ;
Lewinsohn, Thomas M. .
NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO, 2016, 14 :1-15