Fluid intelligence, memory span, and temperament difficulties predict academic performance of young adolescents

被引:89
作者
Colom, Roberto [1 ]
Escorial, Sergio
Shih, Pei Chun
Privado, Jesus
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Psicol, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Cardenal Cisneros, CES Colegio, Madrid, Spain
关键词
fluid intelligence; short-term memory; working memory; processing speed; controlled attention; temperament; academic performance;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.023
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There are several candidate measures when asking which psychological construct significantly predicts academic performance. Hundreds of studies have addressed this issue by measuring intelligence, basic cognitive processes, or personality. However, the simultaneous consideration of a broad and varied array of measures is much less common. Here we consider several cognitive and personality measures concurrently to define latent factors representing six constructs of presumed interest: fluid intelligence, short-term memory, working memory, processing speed, controlled attention, and temperament difficulties. One hundred and thirty-five secondary school students were tested. Their academic performance was measured by average grades in the nine scholastic areas of their curriculum. The main finding shows that a latent factor defined by fluid intelligence and memory span along with a latent factor defined by impulsiveness, sensation seeking, and lack of fear account for an impressive figure of 60% of the variance in academic performance. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1503 / 1514
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[22]   Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade [J].
Fry, AF ;
Hale, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (04) :237-241
[23]   Personality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades [J].
Furnham, A ;
Chamorro-Premuzic, T .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2004, 37 (05) :943-955
[24]   When IQ is controlled, does motivation still predict achievement? [J].
Gagné, F ;
St Père, F .
INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 30 (01) :71-100
[25]   Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age [J].
Gathercole, SE ;
Pickering, SJ ;
Knight, C ;
Stegmann, Z .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :1-16
[26]  
Herrero O, 2002, PSICOTHEMA, V14, P340
[27]  
Herrero O, 2006, PSICOTHEMA, V18, P374
[28]  
Jensen A. R., 1998, INTELLIGENCE INSTRUC
[29]   The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective [J].
Kane, MJ ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2002, 9 (04) :637-671
[30]   A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance [J].
Kuncel, NR ;
Hezlett, SA ;
Ones, DS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2001, 127 (01) :162-181