A review of the evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and cost of acupuncture, massage therapy, and spinal manipulation for back pain

被引:260
作者
Cherkin, DC
Sherman, KJ
Deyo, RA
Shekelle, PG
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Greater Los Angeles Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Few treatments for back pain are supported by strong scientific evidence. Conventional treatments, although widely used, have had limited success. Dissatisfied patients have, therefore, turned to complementary and alternative medical therapies and providers for care for back pain. Purpose: To provide a rigorous and balanced summary of the best available evidence about the effectiveness, safety, and costs of the most popular complementary and alternative medical therapies used to treat back pain. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Study Selection: Systematic reviews of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that were published since 1995 and that evaluated acupuncture, massage therapy, or spinal manipulation for nonspecific back pain and RCTs published since the reviews were conducted. Data Extraction: Two authors independently extracted data from the reviews (including number of RCTs, type of back pain, quality assessment, and conclusions) and original articles (including type of pain, comparison treatments, sample size, outcomes, follow-up intervals, loss to follow-up, and authors' conclusions). Data Synthesis: Because the quality of the 20 RCTs that evaluated acupuncture was generally poor, the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating acute or chronic back pain is unclear. The three RCTs that evaluated massage reported that this therapy is effective for subacute and chronic back pain. A meta-regression analysis of the results of 26 RCTs evaluating spinal manipulation for acute and chronic back pain reported that spinal manipulation was superior to sham therapies and therapies judged to have no evidence of a benefit but was not superior to effective conventional treatments. Conclusions: Initial studies have found massage to be effective for persistent back pain. Spinal manipulation has small clinical benefits that are equivalent to those of other commonly used therapies. The effectiveness of acupuncture remains unclear. All of these treatments seem to be relatively safe. Preliminary evidence suggests that massage, but not acupuncture or spinal manipulation, may reduce the costs of care after an initial course of therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:898 / 906
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]  
Mondloch MV, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V165, P174
[32]   Patient characteristics and physicians' practice activities for patients with chronic low back pain: A practice-based study of primary care and chiropractic physicians [J].
Nyiendo, J ;
Haas, M ;
Goldberg, B ;
Sexton, G .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 24 (02) :92-100
[33]   Acupuncture treatment: side effects and complications reported by Swedish physiotherapists [J].
Odsberg, A ;
Schill, U ;
Haker, E .
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2001, 9 (01) :17-20
[34]  
Parsons T.J., 1999, INT J OBESITY, V23, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3310/HTA3030, 10.3310/hta3030]
[35]  
Preyde M, 2000, CAN MED ASSOC J, V162, P1815
[36]  
Ramsay DJ, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V280, P1518
[37]  
SANDEFUR R, 1997, AHCPR PUBLICATION, P33
[38]   Frequency and characteristics of side effects of spinal manipulative therapy [J].
Senstad, O ;
LeboeufYde, C ;
Borchgrevink, C .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (04) :435-440
[39]   SPINAL MANIPULATION FOR LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
SHEKELLE, PG ;
ADAMS, AH ;
CHASSIN, MR ;
HURWITZ, EL ;
BROOK, RH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (07) :590-598
[40]   One-year follow-up comparison of the cost and effectiveness of chiropractic and physiotherapy as primary management for back pain -: Subgroup analysis, recurrence, and additional health care utilization [J].
Skargren, EI ;
Carlsson, PG ;
Öberg, BE .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (17) :1875-1883