Nitrogen budget for fescue pastures fertilized with broiler litter in major land resource areas of the southeastern US

被引:14
作者
Marshall S.B. [1 ]
Mullen M.D. [2 ]
Cabrera M.L. [3 ]
Wesley Wood C. [4 ]
Braun L.C. [3 ]
A. Guertal E. [4 ]
机构
[1] USDA, ARS, Fayetteville, AR 72701
[2] Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
[3] Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens
[4] Department of Agronomy and Soils, 202 Funchess Hall, Auburn University
关键词
Ammonia volatilization; Broiler litter; Denitrification; Leaching; Nitrogen budget; Plant uptake;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009890723324
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The southeast US produces a tremendous number of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus), which in turn produce massive quantities of litter (manure and bedding materials). In the Southeast, litter is most often disposed of via land application to pastures, however, the ultimate fate of much of the applied nitrogen (N) is not known. We have constructed N budgets for three sites across the southeastern U.S. in an effort to determine how much of the applied N is useful for plant production and how much is left to be absorbed by the environment. Study sites were located in the Coastal Plain (Alabama), Piedmont (Georgia), and Cumberland Plateau (Tennessee) Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA) of the southeastern US. Litter was applied in the Spring of two consecutive years at a rate to supply 70 kg of available N ha-1. The total amount of N applied ranged from 103 to 252 kg N ha-1 depending on site and year. Nitrogen fluxes monitored in this study were broiler litter N, ammonia (NH3) volatilization, denitrification, plant uptake, and leaching. Plant uptake represented the largest flux of applied N, averaging 43% of applied N. Losses due to NH3 volatilization and denitrification combined were only 6% of applied N on average. Loss of N due to NO3-N leaching appeared to be significant only at the Coastal Plain site where NO3-N concentrations in the groundwater peaked at 38 mg N 1-1. We believe the majority of excess N shown in these budgets is likely accounted for by leaching losses and soil accumulation. Regardless of these assumptions and low gaseous losses, it is apparent that on average, 57% of applied N is destined for a fate other than plant uptake. The results of this study indicate that land-application of broiler litter at currently recommended rates has the potential for negative impacts on the environment of the southeastern U.S. in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [31] Rolston D.E., Limitations of the acetylene blockage technique for field measurement of denitrification, pp. 93-101, (1986)
  • [32] Ryden J.C., Effects of acetylene on nitrification and denitrification in two soils during incubation with ammonium nitrate, J Soil Sci, 33, pp. 263-270, (1982)
  • [33] Ryden J.C., Denitrification loss from a grassland soil in the field receiving different rates of nitrogen as ammonium nitrate, J Soil Sci, 34, pp. 355-365, (1983)
  • [34] Schjoerring J., Sommer S., Ferm M., A simple passive sampler for measuring ammonia emission in the field, Water Air Soil Pollut, 62, pp. 13-24, (1992)
  • [35] Scott H.D., Mauromoustakos A., Gilmour J.T., Fate of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in broiler litter applied to tall fescue, Arkansas Agric Exp Stn Bull 947, (1995)
  • [36] Sharpe R.R., Harper L.A., Giddens J.E., Langdale G.W., Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen budget for conservation tilled wheat, Soil Sci Soc Am J, 52, pp. 1394-1398, (1988)
  • [37] Sharpley A.N., Smith S., Bain W., Nitrogen and phosphorus fate from long-term poultry litter applications to Oklahoma soils, Soil Sci Soc Am J, 57, pp. 1131-1137, (1993)
  • [38] Sims G.K., Ellsworth T.R., Mulvaney R.L., Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extracts, Commun in Soil Sci and Plant Anal, 26, pp. 303-316, (1995)
  • [39] Smith C., Freney J., Chalk P., Galbally I., McKenney D., Cai G., Fate of urea nitrogen applied in solution in furrows to sunflowers growing on a red-brown earth: Transformations, losses and plant uptake, Austral J Agri Res, 39, pp. 793-806, (1988)
  • [40] Land resources regions and major land resources areas of the US.USDA-SCS Agric Handb 296, (1981)